activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hadrian Zbarcea <>
Subject Re: Is skinning enough to allow it be be packaged in ActiveMQ?
Date Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:10:45 GMT
There are many comments in this thread. Did you get them? is not a library. Why should it be treated as a library? A 
library would be wicket or angular, or jolokia. is an application.


On 01/27/2014 01:22 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Wow... I expect someone to chime in.
> Does this mean everyone agrees that hawtio needs to be treated like
> every other 3rd party library we redistribute?
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Hiram Chirino <> wrote:
>> Starting up a new thread to avoid hijacking the original POLL thread.
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <> wrote:
>>> Without the community donating the relevant ActiveMQ portions to the
>>> ASF we will not be able to get a consensus around proposal #3. Thus, that
>>> needs to be taken off the table.
>> I think that's a faulty assumption that needs to get discussed and addressed.
>> Any hawtio UI that we package in the ActiveMQ will be reviewed by the
>> PMC.  Like any 3rd party library that we ship, it has to have an
>> approved license and it's functionality has to be tested and verified
>> by the ActiveMQ project.  If we the PMC does not like some detail of
>> hawtio we just need to open issues to address them and once it's to
>> the PMC's liking we can then package it.  This is no different from
>> any other 3rd party lib we use so why are we treating it differently?
>> --
>> Hiram Chirino

View raw message