activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [POLL] - Remove the old ActiveMQ Console
Date Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:19:24 GMT
Rob, that's not quite correct. Karaf *ships with a console*, ActiveMQ 
also ships with a console. The issue we are discussing now is the distro 
content, right?

Hadrian



On 01/17/2014 05:07 PM, Robert Davies wrote:
>
> On 17 Jan 2014, at 21:53, James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>
>> Karaf ships with a console
>
> Yes - its not installed by default - which is equivalent to option 1.
>
>>
>> On Friday, January 17, 2014, Robert Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 17 Jan 2014, at 16:33, James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com<javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Agreed.  My point was that we shouldn't just abandon the console that
>>>> comes with ActiveMQ.  A messaging "product" should have its own
>>>> console, if it is to be taken seriously by potential "customers”.
>>>
>>> I don’t buy in to that at all - having to hit refresh on the web browser
>>> in 2014 to see if the message count has increased  just doesn’t cut it -
>>> and it hasn’t for a long time.
>>> As has been said before, the argument about shipping a console to compete
>>> can be used for a container too - but Karaf doesn’t, it makes it optional -
>>> and that’s a valid point of view that’s worth replicating.
>>>
>>>> Providing an even playing field for consoles shouldn't be ActiveMQ's
>>>> primary concern.  ActiveMQ should concern itself with providing a
>>>> best-of-breed messaging system, which should include a management
>>>> console.
>>>
>>> Or point people to a host of alternatives that would enhance the user
>>> experience.  What I really don’t understand is that the people who are
>>> active committers, and actually fix the security issues as they come are
>>> all saying get rid of the console and our views are being ignored.  Its not
>>> our core competence, nor should it have to be - we are writing a message
>>> broker. If you feel strongly about it you are of course more than welcome
>>> to help write a new console that can be incorporated at a later date.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com<javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> James,
>>>>>
>>>>> 5. Is just business as usual, why should it be part of the poll? Users
>>> raise
>>>>> an issue, it gets fixed.
>>>>>
>>>>> My $0.02,
>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/17/2014 11:25 AM, James Carman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. -1
>>>>>> 2. -1
>>>>>> 3. -1
>>>>>> 4. +1
>>>>>> 5. Resurrect the "old" console and bring it up-to-date, fixing any
>>>>>> outstanding bugs - +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Robert Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com<javascript:;>
>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I want to take a straw poll to see where everyone stands, because
>>> opinion
>>>>>>> has varied, mine included. Straw polls can be a useful tool to
move
>>> towards
>>>>>>> consensus. This isn’t a formal vote, but to reduce the noise,
can we
>>> keep it
>>>>>>> to binding votes only ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. Have one distribution with no default console, but make it
easy to
>>>>>>> deploy a console on demand (the original console - or 3rd party
ones).
>>>>>>> 2. Have two separate distributions, one with no console  - and
have a
>>>>>>> second distribution with the original console
>>>>>>> 3. One distribution, with hawtio as the console -  ActiveMQ branded.
>>>>>>> 4. One distribution, but uses the original ActiveMQ console only.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here’s my vote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]. +1
>>>>>>> [2]  0
>>>>>>> [3] 0
>>>>>>> [4] -1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rob
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Rob Davies
>>> ————————
>>> Red Hat, Inc
>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>
>>>
>
> Rob Davies
> ————————
> Red Hat, Inc
> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
> Twitter: rajdavies
> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>

Mime
View raw message