activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Date Wed, 15 Jan 2014 21:44:33 GMT
The issue is now fixed. Time to finally cut 5.9.1? I volunteer to do it 
if no objections or other takers.

Hadrian



On 01/02/2014 04:28 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> On Dec 30, 2013, at 7:30 AM, Joshua Watkins <joshua.watkins@gamesys.co.uk> wrote:
> This topic seems to have stalled. Is the release still waiting on
>> something?
>
>
> I *think* there were a couple remaining things:
>
> 1) Removing the hawt.io stuff to meet Apache requirements.  I submitted a pull request
for this today.  Hopefully someone can pick it up and get it committed.
>
> 2) Figuring out why the ActiveMQ feature cannot be installed into Karaf.  Basically makes
it very hard to get ActiveMQ running in OSGi.  (AMQ-4833)  I spent some time on this today
and logged an issue with Maven Central.  Hopefully they can open up the restrictions on their
end.  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-2536 is also logged for this.   Anyway,
not something that the ActiveMQ community can do anything about so likely not a holdup anymore.
>
> Anyone have anything else?
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Josh
>>
>> On 11/12/2013 16:23, "Dejan Bosanac" <dejan@nighttale.net> wrote:
>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 is now fixed.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> --
>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>> ----------------------
>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Or just explain upgrade path it in release notes. I'll get it fixed now.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>> ----------------------
>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Davies
>>>> <rajdavies@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Why not just go for a 5.10 and get this fixed ?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11 Dec 2013, at 11:13, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree with this. We should remove activemq-camel from activemq-osgi
>>>>> and
>>>>>> use it as a separate bundle. I'm not sure though if it's a good fix
>>>>> for
>>>>> a
>>>>>> minor release as we need to change features as well. Also upgrade
>>>>> from
>>>>>> 5.9.0 to 5.9.1 in karat would mean you need to upgrade activemq-osgi
>>>>> and
>>>>>> add activemq-camel. What do you guys think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Raul Kripalani <raul@evosent.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would there be a chance to take a look at
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1
>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ
broker
>>>>> within
>>>>>>> an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get
>>>>> ClassNotFoundExceptions
>>>>>>> because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel EndpointCompleter
>>>>> which
>>>>> was
>>>>>>> introduced in later versions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Raúl Kripalani*
>>>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect,
Open
>>>>> Source
>>>>>>> Integration specialist
>>>>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani |
>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>>>>>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac
>>>>> <dejan@nighttale.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All good on my side.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>>>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies
>>>>> <rajdavies@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I¹m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till
5.10 -
>>>>>>> presumably
>>>>>>>>> that won¹t be far away ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release?  I'm happy now
with how the
>>>>> leveldb
>>>>>>>>>> bits are looking.  Any outstanding bits left to do?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rob Davies
>>>>>>>>> ‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
>>>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc
>>>>>>>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>>>>>>>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rob Davies
>>>>> ‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
>>>>> Red Hat, Inc
>>>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>>>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>>>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message