activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
Subject Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Date Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:25:46 GMT
Or just explain upgrade path it in release notes. I'll get it fixed now.

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosanac@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/


On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com> wrote:

> Why not just go for a 5.10 and get this fixed ?
>
> On 11 Dec 2013, at 11:13, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net> wrote:
>
> > I agree with this. We should remove activemq-camel from activemq-osgi and
> > use it as a separate bundle. I'm not sure though if it's a good fix for a
> > minor release as we need to change features as well. Also upgrade from
> > 5.9.0 to 5.9.1 in karat would mean you need to upgrade activemq-osgi and
> > add activemq-camel. What do you guys think?
> >
> > Regards
> > --
> > Dejan Bosanac
> > ----------------------
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> > dbosanac@redhat.com
> > Twitter: @dejanb
> > Blog: http://sensatic.net
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Raul Kripalani <raul@evosent.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Would there be a chance to take a look at
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1 release?
> >>
> >> This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ broker
> within
> >> an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel.
> >>
> >> Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get ClassNotFoundExceptions
> >> because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel EndpointCompleter which
> was
> >> introduced in later versions.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> *Raúl Kripalani*
> >> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source
> >> Integration specialist
> >> http://about.me/raulkripalani |
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> >> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> All good on my side.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> --
> >>> Dejan Bosanac
> >>> ----------------------
> >>> Red Hat, Inc.
> >>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> >>> dbosanac@redhat.com
> >>> Twitter: @dejanb
> >>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> >>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I’m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 -
> >> presumably
> >>>> that won’t be far away ?
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release?  I'm happy now with how the leveldb
> >>>>> bits are looking.  Any outstanding bits left to do?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Hiram Chirino
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >>>>>
> >>>>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
> >>>>
> >>>> Rob Davies
> >>>> ————————
> >>>> Red Hat, Inc
> >>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
> >>>> Twitter: rajdavies
> >>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
> >>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
> Rob Davies
> ————————
> Red Hat, Inc
> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
> Twitter: rajdavies
> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message