activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gary Tully (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Reopened] (AMQ-4564) ActiveMQ creates & initializes ACTIVEMQ_LOCK in wrong database when using separate lock data source
Date Thu, 03 Oct 2013 21:42:44 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Gary Tully reopened AMQ-4564:
-----------------------------

      Assignee: Gary Tully

The support for table creation by the jdbc lockers (createTablesOnStartup attribute) from
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4365 sorts this

> ActiveMQ creates & initializes ACTIVEMQ_LOCK in wrong database when using separate
lock data source
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-4564
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4564
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.5.1
>            Reporter: Tim Boemker
>            Assignee: Gary Tully
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: activemq.log, broker-config.xml
>
>
> When configured to use a secondary database for locking, ActiveMQ creates and initializes
ACTIVEMQ_LOCK in the primary  database.  It then starts as slave because it can't lock the
table in the secondary database.
> Workaround: manually copy the ACTIVEMQ_LOCK table from the primary database to the secondary
database.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Mime
View raw message