activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Gomes <e.se...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Switching from SVN to Git
Date Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:53:21 GMT
Hi Hiram,

If that's possible, that would be great until I can confirm a final
solution.  I'm sure there is one, and I'd hate to hold up a migration that
pretty much everyone else is in favor of.

Best,
Jim



On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com>wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> If your still feeling hesitant, how about we exclude the NMS bits from
> migrating to Git for now?  Would that work for you?
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Jim Gomes <e.semog@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Of particular importance to how we do things, I found the following Q&A
> > extremely helpful.  In particular, this answer (
> > http://stackoverflow.com/a/4120179/444653) to the following question:
> >
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4120001/what-is-the-git-equivalent-for-revision-number
> >
> > Our build process automatically generates build numbers by extracting
> > revision numbers.  This would be an important feature in order to
> > potentially use git directly.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Jim Gomes <e.semog@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Hiram,
> >>
> >> While that particular tool wouldn't quite work for us, I did a little
> more
> >> digging, and came across SubGit (http://subgit.com/).  This tool looks
> >> like it potentially fill the gap seamlessly.  I'll have to look further
> >> into it, but it does seem promising.
> >>
> >> I'll look into it, and revise my vote.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Jim
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Jim,
> >>>
> >>> Git has a similar feature called submodules.  See:
> >>> http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Submodules
> >>>
> >>> But honestly it should not be to much trouble to just script a few git
> >>> checkouts in your build process would it?
> >>>
> >>> I find SVN to be too slow for everyday use. Being able to be able to
> >>> fully use all the SCM features even when offline is also a very bonus.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jim Gomes <e.semog@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > -1
> >>> >
> >>> > We integrate the ActiveMQ NMS build tree into our build process using
> >>> > external references.  Switching to Git will most likely make this
> >>> > impossible.  If there is a solution that can continue to make this
> >>> seamless
> >>> > for us, then I could consider changing my vote.
> >>> >
> >>> > I would also ask what are the advantages?  I see this as something
> that
> >>> > isn't broken and doesn't need fixing.  Merging between branches with
> >>> SVN is
> >>> > extremely easy, and I do it all the time.  I don't understand why
> others
> >>> > complain about it.  The speed for checkouts, updates and commits is
> >>> > excellent.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Willem jiang <willem.jiang@gmail.com
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> +1 and it saves you lots of time if you need to merge between the
> >>> branches.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >> Willem Jiang
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Red Hat, Inc.
> >>> >> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> >>> >> Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com
> >>> >> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (
> >>> http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/)
> >>> >> (English)
> >>> >>           http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
> >>> >> Twitter: willemjiang
> >>> >> Weibo: 姜宁willem
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Friday, June 7, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> > Seems some other projects at the ASF have been switching from
SVN
> to
> >>> >> > Git. How you guys feel about making the switch too? I know
> >>> >> > personally I much prefer using Git to SVN and my main development
> >>> >> > model has been using SVN via Git. Just want to take a poll
to see
> if
> >>> >> > any of the ActiveMQ developers would have strong objections
to
> moving
> >>> >> > to Git.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > --
> >>> >> > Hiram Chirino
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > hchirino@redhat.com (mailto:hchirino@redhat.com) | fusesource.com(
> >>> >> http://fusesource.com) | redhat.com (http://redhat.com)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Hiram Chirino
> >>>
> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >>>
> >>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> >>>
> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >>>
> >>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
>
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>
> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message