activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: Switching from SVN to Git
Date Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:09:50 GMT
Cool could you switch your vote officially to +1 so we can close this
thread out?

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Jim Gomes <e.semog@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Hiram,
>
> If that's possible, that would be great until I can confirm a final
> solution.  I'm sure there is one, and I'd hate to hold up a migration that
> pretty much everyone else is in favor of.
>
> Best,
> Jim
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> If your still feeling hesitant, how about we exclude the NMS bits from
>> migrating to Git for now?  Would that work for you?
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Jim Gomes <e.semog@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Of particular importance to how we do things, I found the following Q&A
>> > extremely helpful.  In particular, this answer (
>> > http://stackoverflow.com/a/4120179/444653) to the following question:
>> >
>> >
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4120001/what-is-the-git-equivalent-for-revision-number
>> >
>> > Our build process automatically generates build numbers by extracting
>> > revision numbers.  This would be an important feature in order to
>> > potentially use git directly.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Jim Gomes <e.semog@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Hiram,
>> >>
>> >> While that particular tool wouldn't quite work for us, I did a little
>> more
>> >> digging, and came across SubGit (http://subgit.com/).  This tool looks
>> >> like it potentially fill the gap seamlessly.  I'll have to look further
>> >> into it, but it does seem promising.
>> >>
>> >> I'll look into it, and revise my vote.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Jim
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
>> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Jim,
>> >>>
>> >>> Git has a similar feature called submodules.  See:
>> >>> http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Submodules
>> >>>
>> >>> But honestly it should not be to much trouble to just script a few git
>> >>> checkouts in your build process would it?
>> >>>
>> >>> I find SVN to be too slow for everyday use. Being able to be able to
>> >>> fully use all the SCM features even when offline is also a very bonus.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jim Gomes <e.semog@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> >>> > -1
>> >>> >
>> >>> > We integrate the ActiveMQ NMS build tree into our build process
using
>> >>> > external references.  Switching to Git will most likely make this
>> >>> > impossible.  If there is a solution that can continue to make this
>> >>> seamless
>> >>> > for us, then I could consider changing my vote.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I would also ask what are the advantages?  I see this as something
>> that
>> >>> > isn't broken and doesn't need fixing.  Merging between branches
with
>> >>> SVN is
>> >>> > extremely easy, and I do it all the time.  I don't understand why
>> others
>> >>> > complain about it.  The speed for checkouts, updates and commits
is
>> >>> > excellent.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Willem jiang <willem.jiang@gmail.com
>> >
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> +1 and it saves you lots of time if you need to merge between
the
>> >>> branches.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >> Willem Jiang
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Red Hat, Inc.
>> >>> >> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> >>> >> Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com
>> >>> >> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (
>> >>> http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/)
>> >>> >> (English)
>> >>> >>           http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
>> >>> >> Twitter: willemjiang
>> >>> >> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Friday, June 7, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> > Seems some other projects at the ASF have been switching
from SVN
>> to
>> >>> >> > Git. How you guys feel about making the switch too? I
know
>> >>> >> > personally I much prefer using Git to SVN and my main
development
>> >>> >> > model has been using SVN via Git. Just want to take a
poll to see
>> if
>> >>> >> > any of the ActiveMQ developers would have strong objections
to
>> moving
>> >>> >> > to Git.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > --
>> >>> >> > Hiram Chirino
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > hchirino@redhat.com (mailto:hchirino@redhat.com) | fusesource.com(
>> >>> >> http://fusesource.com) | redhat.com (http://redhat.com)
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Hiram Chirino
>> >>>
>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> >>>
>> >>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> >>>
>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>> >>>
>> >>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Hiram Chirino
>>
>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>
>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>
>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>
>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>>



-- 
Hiram Chirino

Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.

hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com

skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino

blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo

Mime
View raw message