activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dejan Bosanac (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (AMQ-908) Authorization plugin should have configurable principal classes
Date Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:23:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13613666#comment-13613666
] 

Dejan Bosanac commented on AMQ-908:
-----------------------------------

This has now been improved and has better syntax. Take a look at [AMQ-3883] for more details
                
> Authorization plugin should have configurable principal classes
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-908
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-908
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.1
>            Reporter: Aaron Mulder
>            Assignee: Jonas Lim
>             Fix For: 5.0.0
>
>         Attachments: ASF.LICENSE.NOT.GRANTED--authorizationPlugin.patch, authorizationPlugin.patch,
AuthorizationPlugin.patch, AuthorizationPlugin.patch
>
>
> Currently, if you configure the authorization plugin, it assumes that all principals
listed should be of type {{org.apache.activemq.jaas.GroupPrincipal}}.  This is OK if you're
using ActiveMQ LoginModules, but since there's a fairly small supply of those, it would be
great if you could use arbitrary login modules and tell the authorization plugin which principal
classes to use.  For example, {{groupClass="weblogic.security.principal.WLSGroupImpl}} or
something like that.  A good first step would be to let you change the group class.  A good
second step would be to let you specify user and group classes and then somehow indicate which
names are which (e.g. {{admin="administrators,user:aaron,user:bob"}} or whatever).  Someday
maybe it will be nice to support any arbitrary combination of principal classes but that seems
far away.
> When instantiating the principal classes, I imagine we should use a constructor with
a single String argument if available, or else a default constructor plus a "setName" method,
or else I guess bail.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message