activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Timothy Bish (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-409) Failover fails under load. Client goes into reconnect loop.
Date Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:14:13 GMT


Timothy Bish commented on AMQNET-409:

Committed a change on trunk to the Connection.cs to use the correct logging calls. 
> Failover fails under load. Client goes into reconnect loop.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: AMQNET-409
>                 URL:
>             Project: ActiveMQ .Net
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ActiveMQ
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.6
>         Environment: Should not matter. AMQ is on Linux, Client is on Windows with .NET
>            Reporter: Rob Waite
>            Assignee: Jim Gomes
>         Attachments: Tracer.cs.patch
> We were testing failover under load. We have a queue that I placed 500k messages in.
I then have 5 consumers pulling them as fast as they can. The operations are noops essentially...
so messages are consumed in our case at around 500 messages per second with our test servers.
> I would bring up the consumers and they would be consuming away. I would then "kill -9"
AMQ and then observe the client. From the AMQ web admin... they would come back but you would
see the 5 consumers go back and forth between 5 and 0 and comsumption went down from 500/s
to about 3/s.
> Looking at AMQ logs... there was a series of errors like this " Async error occurred:
javax.jms.JMSException: Unmatched acknowledge: MessageAck" and then there would be a couple
variations of exceptions regarding the connection being lost (EOFException, broken pipe, etc).
There would be an endless loop creating this pattern.. a message about an unmatched ack...
a message about a socket dying... then reconnection from the client... on and on.
> I can provide the full stack traces but I have already found the line that seems to cause
the client to reconnect, fail, disconnect ad infinitum.
> In our particular case... there is a line in the NMS.ActiveMQ source in Connection.cs
line 950 (in Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ-1.5.6-src) that looks like:
> {code:title=Connection.cs|borderStyle=solid}
> Tracer.DebugFormat("Connection[{0}]: Async exception with no exception listener: " +
error, this.ConnectionId);
> {code}
> The "error" variable was populated with:
> {noformat} 
> "Apache.NMS.NMSConnectionException: Unmatched acknowledge: MessageAck {commandId = 1146,
responseRequired = false, ackType = 2, consumerId = ID:kcccccc-54512-634956893773509011-1:10:3:1,
firstMessageId = ID:qaaaaa-54879-634956774946428300-1:0:1:2:60645, lastMessageId = ID:qaaaaaa-ops01-54879-634956774946428300-1:0:1:2:60645,
destination = queue://AAA.RwwTest.Failover, transactionId = null, messageCount = 1, poisonCause
= null}; Could not find Message-ID ID:qaaaaaa-ops01-54879-634956774946428300-1:0:1:2:60645
in dispatched-list (start of ack)"
> {noformat} 
> Notice that there are curly braces in there... when you try to concat this with the first
parameter in the Tracer.DebugFormat call you get a System.FormatException with the message
"Input string was not in a correct format."
> Changing the line to the following seemed to fix the particular case we were seeing..
but I imagine other use cases may cause the same:
> {code:title=Connection.cs|borderStyle=solid}
> Tracer.DebugFormat("Connection[{0}]: Async exception with no exception listener: {1}",
this.ConnectionId, error);
> {code}
> It seems odd that String.Format style logging is used but a string is still concatenated.
This seems to happen in a few places in the code. I would think that either the Tracer should
handle this exception, trim illegal characters or DebugFormat should not use concatenation
for the first param.
> I have not dug incredibly deeply into the source... but I imagine when an exception was
thrown by the log call... it bubbled up and pissed something off. The connection seems to
have been closed by the client... but it did not remove state from the previous attempt. When
it reconnected, the same occurred and then there was the looping effect.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message