Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8417AE73F for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95590 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2013 14:36:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 95542 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2013 14:36:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 95532 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2013 14:36:13 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:36:13 +0000 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:36:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Gary Tully (JIRA)" To: dev@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4157) KahaDBTransactionStore.removeAyncMessage may cancel addMessage when in transaction leading to unpersisted messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549668#comment-13549668 ] Gary Tully commented on AMQ-4157: --------------------------------- There is another workaround, {code}{code} > KahaDBTransactionStore.removeAyncMessage may cancel addMessage when in transaction leading to unpersisted messages > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: AMQ-4157 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4157 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Message Store > Affects Versions: 5.7.0 > Environment: linux 64-bit, kahadb, persisted messages, cached dest, transacted > Reporter: Martin Serrano > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 5.8.0 > > > This was very difficult to track down. It rarely occurs because a certain set of events must be occurring to trigger the bug. I have marked it a Blocker because when it does occur, it is silent and leads to a message not being persisted in the MessageStore. > *Description* > The crux of the bug is that when a rollback on a session occurs, the resulting MessageAck can overlap with the async store of the message in the KahaDB. When this occurs, the message is never persisted. Additionally, the resultant {{CancellationException}} is ignored in o.a.a.broker.region.Queue:796. The steps: > # a StoreQueueTask is created to add a message X. this is put on the async task queue > # meanwhile this message is dispatched via a prefetch subscription to a transacted consumer. > # the transacted consumer calls session.rollback > # this leads to acknowledgement of the dispatched message > # as a result {{destination.removeAsyncMessage()}} is called > # if the original add has not yet executed then it will be cancelled leading to the message never being persisted! (occurs at KahaDBStore:401) > # the Queue.send method uses the result future to make sure the persist happens in the store, but it ignores cancellation, so this can lead execution control to return to the sender when no persistence has occurred without an error. > I have not been able to reproduce this in a small activemq-only test. But I can reproduce it in my environment. > *Proposed Solutions* > I'm really unsure of the solution here. Should {{KahaDBStore.removeAsyncMessage}} (line 393) check the context and only cancel tasks if it is not in a transaction context? But what would that mean in the log? Would there be a removeMessage prior to the addMessage? > *Workaround* > * turn off caching for the destination (see [dest policies|http://activemq.apache.org/per-destination-policies.html]). this will cause messages to be added synchronously so they will not be subject to the async cancellation -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira