From dev-return-35091-apmail-activemq-dev-archive=activemq.apache.org@activemq.apache.org Mon Dec 3 15:42:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31858D39B for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 15:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27683 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2012 15:42:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 27643 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2012 15:42:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 27630 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2012 15:42:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:42:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chubrilo@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.171] (HELO mail-lb0-f171.google.com) (209.85.217.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:42:52 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id gf7so2392035lbb.2 for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:42:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=C1n879X9NAwHxxCBybnIYX31NxEN509enBF3Fix712o=; b=qxWeay0ByIBPJ9qCkRV/OB/r4h7avyfRLOEtEF3h0EtsYH65kqQN2vO5YdSC6YnH4R Yvp4ZM64R6z3+JlBQ6RBUyl2oAueN36PnKOr1qbVmoJYCwH4/PmAEDUwN8KNr7yX7Cul 5G5g6fNEqqP3Bs+NG6I+WNG3fW+zLI7550bD+HysjieGQbiyZJH4xd+3hr+21NdOT6GO sckKaa8/AthfpjkQg+U4o2jlJPKcsKPcFS5pDBFUbsenmwcLLu1gN8RNtKQZ9oUozN/S TiKTVanOgEuOLewzE16rrD2GXt1hz2ml4B1QptkcCbAaHCrng/KjM68gh3ZQCifJu4er 3uCw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.104.115 with SMTP id gd19mr9952315lab.13.1354549350770; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:42:30 -0800 (PST) Sender: chubrilo@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.16.162 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 07:42:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1354454197312-4660069.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1354454197312-4660069.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 16:42:30 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bnK_JVdjPy-Dz43wLstM_0wL_UI Message-ID: Subject: Re: Replacing the server and client sockets in ActiveMQ From: Dejan Bosanac To: dev@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Alon, I never worked with FIPS, but according to this http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/security/jsse/FIPS.html you should be able to use regular sockets and configure the JVM to be FIPS compliant. Regards -- Dejan Bosanac ---------------------- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat dbosanac@redhat.com Twitter: @dejanb Blog: http://sensatic.net ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Alon wrote: > NSS-JSS