activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
Subject Re: Dropping pure master/slave support from 5.8
Date Sat, 10 Nov 2012 19:43:31 GMT
+1

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosanac@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/


On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>> How do you guys feel about dropping pure master/slave support from 5.8?
>>  Pure master/slave adds lots of complexity to the broker implementation yet
>> I've never been able to recommend anyone use it in production due to
>> it's limitations.  M/S based on shared storage is fast, and most
>> importantly very reliable.  So I think we clean house a remove this
>> 'feature'.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> **
>>
>> *Hiram Chirino*
>>
>> *Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.*
>>
>> *hchirino@redhat.com <hchirino@redhat.com> | fusesource.com | redhat.com*
>>
>> *skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino<http://twitter.com/hiramchirino>
>> *
>>
>> *blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo <http://hiramchirino.com/blog/>*
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> Email: cibsen@redhat.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen

Mime
View raw message