activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Queue prioritization.
Date Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:44:52 GMT
Hi Sean,

Prioritization was layered on top of the existing activeMQ storage
solutions, so the ability to optimize was somewhat limited.

thanks,

Rob

On 8 November 2012 01:26, sdonovan_uk <sdonovan_uk@yahoo.com> wrote:

> What is the expectation for queue size and performance when using
> prioritization?
>
> On a queue that has prioritization enabled, if you have more than 60,000
> messages, performance **plummets** -- approximately 10ms per each
> additional
> 1000 messages (timed on a modern Windows server).
>
> I find that odd, given that prioritization could be (mostly?) handled on
> queue-write, not read.
>
> Is this expected, or a bug?
>
> Sean
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Queue-prioritization-tp4658991.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message