activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Justin Field (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (AMQ-4122) Lease Database Locker failover broken
Date Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:42:14 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13493329#comment-13493329
] 

Justin Field edited comment on AMQ-4122 at 11/8/12 5:41 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------

I was never able to resolve the issue so i made the following work around

https://gist.github.com/4040309
                
      was (Author: fieldju):
    I was never able to resolve the issue so i mad the following work around

https://gist.github.com/4040309
                  
> Lease Database Locker failover broken
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-4122
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4122
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.7.0
>         Environment: Java 7u9, SUSE 11, Mysql
>            Reporter: st.h
>            Assignee: Gary Tully
>         Attachments: activemq.xml, activemq.xml
>
>
> We are using ActiveMQ 5.7.0 together with a mysql database and could not observe correct
failover behavior with lease database locker.
> It seems that there is a race condition, which prevents the correct failover procedure.
> We noticed that when starting up two instances, both instance are becoming master.
> We did several test, including the following and could not observe intended functionality:
> - shutdown all instances
> - manipulate database lock that one node has lock and set expiry time in distance future
> - start up both instances. both instances are unable to acquire lock, as the lock hasn't
expired, which should be correct behavior.
> - update the expiry time in database, so that the lock is expired.
> - first instance notices expired lock and becomes master
> - when second instance checks for lock, it also updates the database and becomes master.
> To my understanding the second instance should not be able to update the lock, as it
is held by the first instance and should not be able to become master.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message