Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of claus.ibsen@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAA=go7kAKcMHaHKUS3NqcBedeW06QQOoESHcNMhZTeWJ0Jgs5g@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGB5yNno-1NoA7R+VqNkFq7Jp_H8tbeM0j32333A8KVUY4RiWw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGB5yNk4OaVUqDBbOhQrHHJATByzy=swYUe5K5nvL8obDJt6fw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA=go7kAKcMHaHKUS3NqcBedeW06QQOoESHcNMhZTeWJ0Jgs5g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:02:27 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAGB5yN=kscg4nmrEcO0Sz7RpPtoYXG=KsYFqSUYVb=r_E=tZcg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] - ActiveMQ 5.7 release
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Gaurav Sharma
<gaurav.cs.sharma@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Claus. Should we run benchmark tests on EC2
> (http://hiramchirino.com/jms-benchmark/ec2-c1.xlarge/index.html) to
> ensure that performance has not regressed - before or after cutting
> RC1?
>

Yeah this could be a good idea. Lets get in touch with Hiram, to see
if he can do a test run.
Whether using SNAPSHOT or waiting for the RC cut.


> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> So in recent time I have been polishing the AMQ trunk codebase to
>> prepare it for the 5.7 release.
>>
>> I went as far to run test suites on Windows with Java 7 :)
>> There were one tests which failed all the time, but the other tests
>> can pass as well.
>>
>> I have also tested with Java7 on my osx, and the Apache CI servers
>> have jobs for testing with Java7 as well. I think they run on ubuntu.
>> Anyway I think we are shaping up really well.
>>
>> Anyone got anything they would like to get address before we start
>> considering cutting a RC ?
>>
>> I got some tests which identified some leaks in the activemq-pool,
>> which I would like to polish up and bring into the codebase.
>> As they require a separate broker to run, we could possible have it to
>> be run manually. But then ppl can run it from time to time, to avoid
>> regressions or introducing new leaks. The test is from a JMS client
>> point of view using Camel.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> -----------------
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> Email: cibsen@redhat.com
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Twitter: davsclaus
>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen


-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen