activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (AMQ-3644) Derby Persistence Adapter does not work with large queue
Date Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:05:07 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13458663#comment-13458663
] 

Claus Ibsen commented on AMQ-3644:
----------------------------------

Have you raised this issue with Apache Derby? People very often uses prepared statements for
the same SQL queries to be executed.
                
> Derby Persistence Adapter does not work with large queue
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-3644
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3644
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Message Store
>    Affects Versions: 5.4.2, 5.4.3, 5.5.1
>            Reporter: Steffen Kuche
>              Labels: broker, derby, messages, persistence
>             Fix For: NEEDS_REVIEWED
>
>         Attachments: patch.txt, test.zip
>
>
> Our application was blocked by activemq when a consumer reconnects to the broker after
a longer time.
> It pointed out, that the method DefaultJDBCAdapter.recoverNextMessages took about *three
minutes* to recover the next 20 Messages for the Store Based Cursor. Here is the corresponding
stacktrace:
> {noFormat}
> "BrokerService[embedded] Task" daemon prio=10 tid=0x0000000042bcf000 nid=0x17fd runnable
[0x00007f2b342a1000]
>    java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
> 	at java.io.FileOutputStream.open(Native Method)
> 	at java.io.FileOutputStream.<init>(FileOutputStream.java:194)
> 	at java.io.FileOutputStream.<init>(FileOutputStream.java:145)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.io.DirFile.getOutputStream(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.store.raw.data.StreamFileContainer.run(Unknown Source)
> 	at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.store.raw.data.StreamFileContainer.privGetOutputStream(Unknown
Source)
> 	- locked <0x00000000f23e6640> (a org.apache.derby.impl.store.raw.data.StreamFileContainer)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.store.raw.data.StreamFileContainer.load(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.store.raw.data.BaseDataFileFactory.addAndLoadStreamContainer(Unknown
Source)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.store.raw.xact.Xact.addAndLoadStreamContainer(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.store.access.sort.MergeSort.createMergeRun(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.store.access.sort.MergeInserter.insert(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.sql.execute.SortResultSet.loadSorter(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.sql.execute.SortResultSet.openCore(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.sql.execute.BasicNoPutResultSetImpl.open(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.sql.GenericPreparedStatement.executeStmt(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.sql.GenericPreparedStatement.execute(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedStatement.executeStatement(Unknown Source)
> 	- locked <0x00000000a4981ec8> (a org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection40)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedPreparedStatement.executeStatement(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedPreparedStatement.executeQuery(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.commons.dbcp.DelegatingPreparedStatement.executeQuery(DelegatingPreparedStatement.java:96)
> 	at org.apache.commons.dbcp.DelegatingPreparedStatement.executeQuery(DelegatingPreparedStatement.java:96)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.store.jdbc.adapter.DefaultJDBCAdapter.doRecoverNextMessages(DefaultJDBCAdapter.java:929)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.store.jdbc.JDBCMessageStore.recoverNextMessages(JDBCMessageStore.java:229)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.store.ProxyMessageStore.recoverNextMessages(ProxyMessageStore.java:88)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.broker.region.cursors.QueueStorePrefetch.doFillBatch(QueueStorePrefetch.java:97)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.broker.region.cursors.AbstractStoreCursor.fillBatch(AbstractStoreCursor.java:262)
> 	- locked <0x00000000ad06ca48> (a org.apache.activemq.broker.region.cursors.QueueStorePrefetch)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.broker.region.cursors.AbstractStoreCursor.reset(AbstractStoreCursor.java:110)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.broker.region.cursors.StoreQueueCursor.reset(StoreQueueCursor.java:157)
> 	- locked <0x00000000ad06ca00> (a org.apache.activemq.broker.region.cursors.StoreQueueCursor)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.broker.region.Queue.doPageIn(Queue.java:1678)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.broker.region.Queue.pageInMessages(Queue.java:1898)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.broker.region.Queue.iterate(Queue.java:1425)
> 	- locked <0x00000000ad06d010> (a org.apache.activemq.broker.region.Queue$3)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.thread.PooledTaskRunner.runTask(PooledTaskRunner.java:122)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.thread.PooledTaskRunner$1.run(PooledTaskRunner.java:43)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> {noFormat}
> During these three minutes the producer was blocked. This situation is illustrated by
the stack of the producer Thread:
> {noFormat}
> "RMI TCP Connection(13)-10.0.0.42" daemon prio=10 tid=0x0000000041cca800 nid=0x1716 waiting
on condition [0x00007f2b2b7f3000]
>    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
> 	at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
> 	- parking to wait for  <0x00000000fae32cd0> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:158)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.ArrayBlockingQueue.take(ArrayBlockingQueue.java:317)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.transport.FutureResponse.getResult(FutureResponse.java:40)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.transport.ResponseCorrelator.request(ResponseCorrelator.java:87)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.syncSendPacket(ActiveMQConnection.java:1276)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.send(ActiveMQSession.java:1760)
> 	- locked <0x00000000fae31548> (a java.lang.Object)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageProducer.send(ActiveMQMessageProducer.java:231)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledProducer.send(PooledProducer.java:74)
> 	- locked <0x00000000fae31068> (a org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageProducer)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledProducer.send(PooledProducer.java:55)
> 	at com.subshell.sophora.server.application.replication.Master.sendMessage(Master.java:117)
> 	at com.subshell.sophora.server.application.replication.Master.sendServerEvent(Master.java:79)
> 	at com.subshell.sophora.server.application.replication.ReplicationMaster.consumeEvent(ReplicationMaster.java:100)
> 	at com.subshell.sophora.server.application.manager.impl.ObservationManager.afterCompletion(ObservationManager.java:74)
> 	at org.springframework.transaction.support.TransactionSynchronizationUtils.invokeAfterCompletion(TransactionSynchronizationUtils.java:168)
> 	at org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.invokeAfterCompletion(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:996)
> 	at org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.triggerAfterCompletion(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:971)
> 	at org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.processCommit(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:799)
> 	at org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.commit(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:723)
> 	at org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAspectSupport.commitTransactionAfterReturning(TransactionAspectSupport.java:393)
> 	at org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionInterceptor.invoke(TransactionInterceptor.java:120)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.aspectj.MethodInvocationProceedingJoinPoint.proceed(MethodInvocationProceedingJoinPoint.java:80)
> 	at com.subshell.sophora.commons.profile.Profiler.profile(Profiler.java:130)
> 	at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor24.invoke(Unknown Source)
> 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.aspectj.AbstractAspectJAdvice.invokeAdviceMethodWithGivenArgs(AbstractAspectJAdvice.java:621)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.aspectj.AbstractAspectJAdvice.invokeAdviceMethod(AbstractAspectJAdvice.java:610)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.aspectj.AspectJAroundAdvice.invoke(AspectJAroundAdvice.java:65)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.aspectj.AspectJAfterAdvice.invoke(AspectJAfterAdvice.java:42)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:161)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.framework.adapter.MethodBeforeAdviceInterceptor.invoke(MethodBeforeAdviceInterceptor.java:50)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:161)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:90)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:202)
> 	at $Proxy37.saveDocument(Unknown Source)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:309)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150)
> 	at com.subshell.sophora.server.remoting.RemoteInvocationTraceInterceptor.invoke(RemoteInvocationTraceInterceptor.java:35)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172)
> 	at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:202)
> 	at $Proxy40.saveDocument(Unknown Source)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> 	at org.springframework.remoting.support.RemoteInvocation.invoke(RemoteInvocation.java:205)
> 	at org.springframework.remoting.support.DefaultRemoteInvocationExecutor.invoke(DefaultRemoteInvocationExecutor.java:38)
> 	at org.springframework.remoting.support.RemoteInvocationBasedExporter.invoke(RemoteInvocationBasedExporter.java:78)
> 	at org.springframework.remoting.rmi.RmiBasedExporter.invoke(RmiBasedExporter.java:73)
> 	at org.springframework.remoting.rmi.RmiInvocationWrapper.invoke(RmiInvocationWrapper.java:72)
> 	at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor32.invoke(Unknown Source)
> 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> 	at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:305)
> 	at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:159)
> 	at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> 	at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Transport.java:155)
> 	at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(TCPTransport.java:535)
> 	at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run0(TCPTransport.java:790)
> 	at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run(TCPTransport.java:649)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> {noFormat}
> After same research it turned out, that Derby writes multiple gigabyte of temporary files
in its tmp directory during the select statement. Afterwards these temporary files are deleted
and rebuild when the next messages are requested from the message store. The problem is the
PreparedStatement that is used for the select statement. When I changed the PreparedStatement
to a normal Statement the execution time got lower than 10ms. 
> In the attachment you can find a patch, how I fixed this issue. 
> Furthermore you can find a Test-Program (you can import it as a Maven-Eclipse project)
which reproduces this issue. 
> This program creates a derby database with a the activemq Message table and fills it
with data (2000 Messages, this can take several hours). I assumed 3MB for one message as our
messages contain same binary data and has an average size of 3MB.
> After the database is built one time a Statement and one time a PreparedStatment is used
to retrieve the next messages.
> The Statement takes about 1 ms and the PreparedStatement about 258805 ms. Also the second
PreparedStatement takes as much time.
> Here are the temporary files created by derby during the select Statement:
> {noFormat}
> insgesamt 5,4G
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:48 T1324630116288.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:49 T1324630116289.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:49 T1324630116290.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:49 T1324630116291.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:49 T1324630116292.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:49 T1324630116293.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:50 T1324630116294.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:50 T1324630116295.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:50 T1324630116296.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:50 T1324630116297.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:51 T1324630116298.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:51 T1324630116299.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:51 T1324630116300.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:51 T1324630116301.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:51 T1324630116302.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:52 T1324630116303.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:52 T1324630116304.tmp
>  287M 2011-12-23 09:52 T1324630116305.tmp
>  284M 2011-12-23 09:52 T1324630116306.tmp
> {noFormat}
> The exeuction of a cleanup (DefaultJDBCAdapter.doDeleteOldMessages) also took about 6
Minutes.
> But in this case I patched activemq not to do a cleanup at all, as our messages don't
expire.
> I'm almost sure that this issue can be observed in other methodes of the DefaultJDBCAdapter.
But for us it was sufficient to fix it in the recovering of messages.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message