Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8518BDD02 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 01:28:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83675 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2012 01:28:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 83639 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2012 01:28:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 83630 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2012 01:28:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 01:28:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of genspring@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.171] (HELO mail-lb0-f171.google.com) (209.85.217.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 01:28:12 +0000 Received: by lbom4 with SMTP id m4so71975lbo.2 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:27:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=LS6ZmA00L/1cR5VDukS/KJIpsgVykcA3kUrYGQ0FxLk=; b=CoAwukGahk2+ETKfd1hNMWOvkaGlG2An8Lgcspqz7ToQzgmvAieItKoWMEqAg7FnP/ yV+AiwCByTBZ7Z+0/sWzRdUUqfT1bR3FHegeqMj1VfKOxQ+qE2WOK9WN+mOsb+xpAY5t 0y9hGvjXwToe7plIdNKe7LUSJm59mDj2tKaFFM5FYxE+FNAhDE1UeO/SrgFsCgSuoRf3 UTAsUPt3WsGpnPUiFyPXMF6O0BOXpp9Wp8bLA0Y2yHSIcfFL0GrG+l0GRJFU3T8IkGNq GTiLeqvkziPBnw9pzUQIGWVIKqU7vArYa9+AYQph49RFWCiSs9xz/uI66Lj2Intg2ado ccpg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.104.171 with SMTP id gf11mr16631003lab.5.1343784472096; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:27:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.57.164 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:27:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:27:52 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will there be any issue if I use activemq 4.x connector to connect ActiveMQ 5.x server ? From: Shawn Jiang To: dev@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04083de71d30ba04c62a349f --f46d04083de71d30ba04c62a349f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thank you, Gary ! It's not that hard to upgrade the client, I'll update the client to match the broker version. "In summary, If you update the broker, you also need to update the clients; or at least consider it!" On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Gary Tully wrote: > I wrote some detail on this a while back > > http://blog.garytully.com/2010/08/reminder-jms-is-client-server.html > > If you must mix versions, the bottom line is you will have to 'ask the > computer' > > On 31 July 2012 08:22, Shawn Jiang wrote: > > Hello, > > > > A geronimo 2.1.x user wants to use embed activemq 4.x connector/adapter > to > > connect ActiveMQ 5.x broker. Can anyone give some hints about if > there's > > any compatibility risk doing so ? > > > > -- > > Shawn > > > > -- > http://fusesource.com > http://blog.garytully.com > -- Shawn --f46d04083de71d30ba04c62a349f--