activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gary Tully (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (AMQ-3825) Exceptions in broker logs :- Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long:
Date Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:02:37 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13411363#comment-13411363
] 

Gary Tully commented on AMQ-3825:
---------------------------------

can you attach your activemq.xml
note that the values for inactivity are negotiated. The min of the values from the each end
of the transport are used. So the min of the values from the connectionfactory tcp url and
the broker transport connector url
                
> Exceptions in broker logs :- Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException:
Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-3825
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3825
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker, Connector
>    Affects Versions: 5.5.1
>            Reporter: Bhanu
>
> Hi,
> I am seeing lot of InactivityIO exceptions in my broker logs:-
> activemq.log.2012-03-01:2012-03-01 18:56:49,519 | INFO  | Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException:
Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: /10.240.170.27:42813 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport
| InactivityMonitor Async Task: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@8fe952[State
= 0, empty queue]
> activemq.log.2012-03-01:2012-03-01 19:06:52,464 | INFO  | Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException:
Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: /10.253.127.196:62265 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport
| InactivityMonitor Async Task: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@1501b4f[State
= 0, empty queue]
> activemq.log.2012-03-01:2012-03-01 19:27:37,074 | INFO  | Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException:
Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: /149.77.160.18:52472 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport
| InactivityMonitor Async Task: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@19e0323[State
= 0, empty queue]
> activemq.log.2012-03-01:2012-03-01 23:33:51,632 | INFO  | Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException:
Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: /149.77.160.18:33558 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport
| InactivityMonitor Async Task: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@168a9ba[State
= 0, empty queue]
> activemq.log.2012-03-01:2012-03-01 23:33:56,975 | INFO  | Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException:
Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: /149.77.160.18:55158 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport
| InactivityMonitor Async Task: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@116f46b[State
= 0, empty queue]
> I am trying to reproduce this with the pooled connection factory but this is not consistently
reproducible. Can somebody throw light on the exact cause of this. I don't want to use the
inactivityMonitor property.
> Thanks,
> Bhanu

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message