Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 551A39E1F for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96844 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2012 05:07:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 96601 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2012 05:07:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 96556 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2012 05:07:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:07:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of suonayi2006@163.com designates 220.181.13.122 as permitted sender) Received: from [220.181.13.122] (HELO m13-122.163.com) (220.181.13.122) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:07:11 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Received:Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID; bh=8D8ZqMhodUla rtdcRACPb/AU9jvEEplXRDcAehu1vWc=; b=pqKRgrkTRWJzL7PO2wujx/zmn2fT temE15ZusybeV6+VR30A+yjnFJJd2qkMc9g2XZkHqnGCH4ljLE5YXszP5dkVdHOA pRmtiCWjZmpzIfRPN4tFEccfZi8oI0bEVwwHtR3bEADNcrUuleAB1VGcfHl+nPSV VjG/YNsR6TGj7cM= Received: from suonayi2006$163.com ( [203.119.80.8] ) by ajax-webmail-wmsvr122 (Coremail) ; Wed, 16 May 2012 13:06:46 +0800 (CST) X-Originating-IP: [203.119.80.8] Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:06:46 +0800 (CST) From: SuoNayi To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Reply:Issue with ActiveMQ 5.5 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Coremail Webmail Server Version SP_ntes V3.5 build 20120503(18352.4652.4642) Copyright (c) 2002-2012 www.mailtech.cn 163com In-Reply-To: <99589B718846B14DB0E93E3F565C80FA0A82FEF4@emea-tc2-mb01.internal.sungard.corp> References: <99589B718846B14DB0E93E3F565C80FA0A82FEF4@emea-tc2-mb01.internal.sungard.corp> X-CM-CTRLDATA: 6V40sGZvb3Rlcl9odG09MTU0MDo4MQ== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_320394_1814196443.1337144806834" MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2f4925a6.1d3a3.137540a8db3.Coremail.suonayi2006@163.com> X-CM-TRANSID: esGowEB5LUPnNbNPviYgAA--.980W X-CM-SenderInfo: xvxr0td1lsiiqw6rljoofrz/1tbiEBWwGk9ozBclkAABsn X-Coremail-Antispam: 1U5529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7vcSsGvfC2KfnxnUU== ------=_Part_320394_1814196443.1337144806834 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit misconfiguration, you'd better show your activemq.xml of broker. -- Wangyin SuoNayi2006@163.com At 2012-05-16 12:56:42,Sheetal.Kulkarni@sungard.com wrote: > >Hi, > >I have configured individual dead letter queues . Now when exception occurred, I expect that I get the message in individual dead letter queues. >But however activemq by default sends the message to default "ActiveMQ.DLQ" and not to my individual queues. >We have system in production, please tell me if it is a known issue? > >Thanks >Sheetal ------=_Part_320394_1814196443.1337144806834--