activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
Subject Re: Need to migrate off Confluence Wiki
Date Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:36:53 GMT
And also it make easier for people to contribute the docs, as they don't
need any permission to access wiki, but just submit a regular patch.


Regards
-- 
Dejan Bosanac
Senior Software Engineer | FuseSource Corp.
dejanb@fusesource.com | fusesource.com
skype: dejan.bosanac | twitter: @dejanb
blog: http://www.nighttale.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/



On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com>wrote:

> With a MoinMoin wiki we are still going to face the same kind of versioning
> hell problems we have with our current wiki content.  We tend to use our
> websites to document our products and that very quickly changes from
> version to version.  Would be nice to be able to solve the versioning
> problem by storing website doc in the same source branches as the products
> so that they can stay in sync.
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Jeremiah Jordan <
> JEREMIAH.JORDAN@morningstar.com> wrote:
>
> > Why the need to make them static?  Why not move them to the MoinMoin
> wiki?
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: chirino@gmail.com [chirino@gmail.com] on behalf of Hiram Chirino [
> > hiram@hiramchirino.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 8:55 AM
> > To: ActiveMQ-Developers
> > Subject: Need to migrate off Confluence Wiki
> >
> > ASF is going to take all Confluence instances offline I think by the end
> of
> > the year.  We need to migrate our wiki docs to a static site generation
> > tool.  The Karaf, Camel, and even Apollo project have or are migrating to
> > Scalate based site generation system.  I guess we should follow suite and
> > do the same.  Anybody interested in trying to tackle this big problem?
>  We
> > would also need to do the same for thing the NMS and CMS sub-projects.
>  One
> > of the side benefits to moving to a static site generation system is that
> > we will be able to version our docs along with the project releases so
> that
> > they stay in simple and in sync with project version.
> >
> > --
> >
> > **
> >
> > *Hiram Chirino*
> >
> > *Software Fellow | FuseSource Corp.*
> >
> > *chirino@fusesource.com | fusesource.com*
> >
> > *skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino<
> > http://twitter.com/hiramchirino>
> > *
> >
> > *blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo <http://hiramchirino.com/blog/>*
> >
> > *
> > *
> >
> > *
> > *
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> **
>
> *Hiram Chirino*
>
> *Software Fellow | FuseSource Corp.*
>
> *chirino@fusesource.com | fusesource.com*
>
> *skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino<
> http://twitter.com/hiramchirino>
> *
>
> *blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo <http://hiramchirino.com/blog/>*
>
> *
> *
>
> *
> *
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message