activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Should we recut the Apollo 1.0 RC?
Date Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:06:45 GMT
+1

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> After the Apollo 1.0 RC has been cut the following issues have been
> reported against it:
>
> * APLO-136 - Broker complains when a dot is used in a dsub name
> * APLO-138 - examples: java readme instructions are incorrect
> * APLO-137 - usability: apollo script should echo usage when called with no
> arguments
>
> While I don't think any of the above issues are major enough to block a
> release, since this is the first 1.0 release, I think perhaps we should
> recut the release candidate to bring in the fixes for APLO-137 and APLO-138
> since those affect the initial user experience.
>
> What do you guys think?
>
> --
>
> **
>
> *Hiram Chirino*
>
> *Software Fellow | FuseSource Corp.*
>
> *chirino@fusesource.com | fusesource.com*
>
> *skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino<http://twitter.com/hiramchirino>
> *
>
> *blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo <http://hiramchirino.com/blog/>*
>
> *
> *



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/

Mime
View raw message