activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Carl Allain (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (AMQ-3448) Zombie ActiveMQ Connection Dispatcher threads - seems to consume all process File Descriptors (FD leak)
Date Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:42:14 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13126632#comment-13126632
] 

Carl Allain commented on AMQ-3448:
----------------------------------

One short-term solution for us could be to keep the 5.3.2 clients and use the 5.5 server.
Would that version difference between the client and the server be ok or are they incompatible???
                
> Zombie ActiveMQ Connection Dispatcher threads - seems to consume all process File Descriptors
(FD leak)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-3448
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3448
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.3.2
>         Environment: Active MQ 5.3.2
> java version "1.6.0_23"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_23-b05)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 19.0-b09, mixed mode)
> LSB Version: :core-3.1-amd64:core-3.1-ia32:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.1-amd64:graphics-3.1-ia32:graphics-3.1-noarch
> Distributor ID: CentOS
> Description: CentOS release 5.5 (Final)
> Release: 5.5
> Codename: Final
>            Reporter: Carl Allain
>            Priority: Critical
>
> Somehow linked to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3286 which was closed. I
am opening here as I cannot reopen the old bug and I hope that with the information I provide
here, someone will be able to have some insight of the possible cause and a fix.
> I don't know how to reproduce with a test case, but I have found 800+ of such "ActiveMQ
Connection Dispatcher" threads. I also noted that the number of FDs for the process keeps
increasing and after a few days, we have a "too many files opened" when going beyond the 1024
limit. Most of those FDs (hundreds) do look like:
> java 6700 lexo-ext 904u sock 0,5 1741176200 can't identify protocol
> There is not much activity on the system and that is still enough to get the problem.
> When we reach the limit of FDs, we get tons of stack traces in the logs, filling up the
hard disk...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message