Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:08:59 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Gary Tully (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Message-ID: 
 <64429691.13159.1299841739553.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <888297851.6967.1299641399375.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (AMQ-3211) JMSXUserId Can be spoofed
 by client
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005593#comment-13005593 ] 

Gary Tully edited comment on AMQ-3211 at 3/11/11 11:07 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------

there is an additional broker attribute: useAuthenticatedPrincipalForJMSXUserID which will ensure that the authenticated principal is placed in the JMSXUserId, such that it is explicitly set or overridden in the authenticated case. 


      was (Author: gtully):
    new broker attribute: useAuthenticatedPrincipalForJMSXUserID which will ensure user id "guest" ends up in JMSXUserID
  
> JMSXUserId Can be spoofed by client
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-3211
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3211
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 5.4.2
>            Reporter: Michael Steiner
>            Assignee: Gary Tully
>             Fix For: 5.5.0
>
>         Attachments: JMSXUserID-bug.conf-src.tar.bz2, JMSXUserID-bug.diff
>
>
> It seems the JMSXUserId can be spoofed by client contrary to what http://activemq.apache.org/jmsxuserid.html says.
> My test setup is populateJMSXUserID="true set in a single broker, a JAAS config org.apache.activemq.jaas.TextFileCertificateLoginModule and using mutual auth SSL (i.e., ?needClientAuth=true for transportConnector setup), and a single consumer and producer based on small modifications of the ConsumerTool and ProducerTool examples in the 5.4.2 distro.  See attached the changes to the distro package to demonstrate the bug. Just do
> 1. run apache-activemq-5.4.2/bin/activemq-admin start
> 2. in apache-activemq-5.4.2/example run ant consumer -Durl=ssl://localhost:61617 -Dmax=3 -Dverbose=true
> 3. in another shell in apache-activemq-5.4.2/example run ant producer -Durl=ssl://localhost:61617 -Dmax=3 -Dverbose=true
> 4. look at the output of the consumer for the properties printed after each received message (the producer spoofs only on even numbered messages)
> When the client does not set the property, then i get the properly authenticated DN as JMSXUserID using message.getStringProperty("JMSXUserID"). However, when the client sets it, i get the value set by the client.  The only difference i notice is that in the former case, message.getPropertyNames() does not return JMSXUserID whereas in the spoofed case it does. 
> i wonder whether in the context of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-943 or https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2840 (which interestingly doesn't list JMSXUserID as supported in a comment even though it is?) something got messed up?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira