Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35661 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2011 18:31:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2011 18:31:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 44677 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2011 18:31:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 44438 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2011 18:31:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 44430 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2011 18:31:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:31:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:31:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066BC196AE7 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:31:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Arthur Naseef (JIRA)" To: dev@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1825356081.669.1297881090022.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <12393369.174281295912563396.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (AMQ-3154) unable to implement custom broker-to-broker authorization MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12995443#comment-12995443 ] Arthur Naseef commented on AMQ-3154: ------------------------------------ I'm looking for some quick feedback on the fit of this solution; we would like to make use of this update, but prefer to have reason to believe it is a good fit first. If not, I will gladly implement an alternate approach. > unable to implement custom broker-to-broker authorization > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AMQ-3154 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3154 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Broker > Affects Versions: 5.4.2 > Reporter: Arthur Naseef > Attachments: pre_add_broker.patch > > > Ran into the following issues preventing a custom Broker-To-Broker authentication implementation: > - BrokerFilter's addBroker() can not be used to secure a connection: > - for duplex connections, it is never called on the initial conneciton > - even if addBroker() throws an exception, it does not deny access (it does not close the connection nor prevent other functioning) > - addBroker() does not have direct access to the ConnectionContext, nor any other means for the BrokerFilter to access SSL certificates on the SSL transport > - BrokerFilter's addConnection() can not be used to secure a connection: > - there is no way to distinguish broker connections from clients > Other approaches were considered, but lead to dead-ends. > It seems the optimal solution would use the existing addBroker() method. > A patch will be provided that adds a new method specifically for securing Broker-To-Broker connections. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira