Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63603 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2010 16:51:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Dec 2010 16:51:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 66527 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 16:51:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 66266 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 16:51:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 65964 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2010 16:51:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:51:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:51:23 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBGGp1ZZ008368 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:51:02 GMT Message-ID: <16973986.160261292518261586.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:51:01 -0500 (EST) From: "Timothy Bish (JIRA)" To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12972139#action_12972139 ] Timothy Bish commented on AMQNET-294: ------------------------------------- Sorry, I was interpreting the use of deadlock as an actual deadlock in the client and not just the client not receiving any more messages. I think the older NMS clients weren't clearing out their in progress message list correctly so you probably where getting the old messages delivered. You might see unmatched message acks on the broker with the older ones. > durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AMQNET-294 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294 > Project: ActiveMQ .Net > Issue Type: Bug > Components: NMS > Affects Versions: 1.4.1 > Environment: Windows 7 (client), Windows Server 2008 64-bit (server brokers run on), Sql Server 2008 (database) > Reporter: Mark Gellings > Assignee: Jim Gomes > Fix For: 1.5.0 > > Attachments: Apache.NMS.Test (2).zip, Apache.NMS.Test.zip, DurableConsumerTest.cs, DurableSubscriberFailoverTest.java, NMSLog.txt, NMSLogLocalFreshCannedActiveMQ542Broker.txt, TimsTestRevisedSlightly.zip > > > We are seeing message loss on a durable subscription when using NMS ActiveMQ v1.4.1 and ActiveMQ v5.4.1. > Please run the included NUnit test and watch the console output. When it says "Failover the broker now!" do as it says. About 75% of the time less than half of the expected 250 messages come through. > Using version 1.1 of NMS the majority of the time the test passes. I have seen it fail only a few times with this earlier version, and when it does there are only a couple messages that don't come through. > In the zip file will be the unit test, and a config directory containing the master and slave activemq configurations. We are using JDBC master/slave. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.