Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99501 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 09:23:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 09:23:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 67289 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 09:23:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 67167 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 09:23:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 67153 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 09:23:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:23:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1330.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:23:47 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3M9NQ1J013487 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:23:26 GMT Message-ID: <391448.1581271928206542.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:23:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ben Poor (JIRA)" To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (AMQ-2081) Allow SimpleAuthenticationBroker to assign privileges to 'anonymous' users. In-Reply-To: <1689843715.1232461679425.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: ae95407df07c98740808b2ef9da0087c [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=59028#action_59028 ] Ben Poor commented on AMQ-2081: ------------------------------- Apologies for what may seem like a bump, but is there any idea as to when/if this issue is going to be looked at? I'm happy if its seen as pointless - just some feedback really. > Allow SimpleAuthenticationBroker to assign privileges to 'anonymous' users. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AMQ-2081 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2081 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Broker > Affects Versions: 5.2.0 > Reporter: Ben Poor > Priority: Minor > Attachments: AMQ-2081.diff > > > When using the SimpleAuthenticationBroker, there is currently no way to have a combination of 'anonymous' and 'privileged' users. > For example, setting up an externally accesible queue or topic, it is often desirable to allow external users access without having to specify a username/password, i.e. read-only. It is similarly desirable to allow internal users access on a read/write basis by specifying a username/password. > It should be possible to instruct the SimpleAuthenticationBroker that users without a username/password should be put into a specific group for 'anonymous' users, and hence have privileges assigned to them, whilst also allowing privileges to be assigned to users that provide authentication details. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.