From dev-return-18366-apmail-activemq-dev-archive=activemq.apache.org@activemq.apache.org Mon Jan 04 18:28:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18225 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2010 18:28:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jan 2010 18:28:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 56408 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2010 18:28:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 56322 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2010 18:28:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 56312 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2010 18:28:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:28:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.136.44.62] (HELO smtp107.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (98.136.44.62) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:27:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 26553 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2010 18:27:31 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:X-Mailer; b=ciUDkwXqooPIjzDogOEbMVnWLXznm+GmsMoePvq957H9isOtWbjpwQt3C6vxGiRS0iBs07HC26vo0X9uXRVhXfM4ZVO7WSi46Gfu8iMRj+DX533wZg96miGSEi81UrtCZJ/i+qzbhmliWiYhu+ea0jIrjf48KaIbBs00kfQO/Aw= ; Received: from 076-076-148-215.pdx.net (david_jencks@76.76.148.215 with plain) by smtp107.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 04 Jan 2010 10:27:31 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: .9oIUzyswBANsYgUm_5uPui0skTnzGJXJQ-- X-YMail-OSG: cAQF1psVM1l__WESCeuHa4hPbICsVJp6r0T8_.3SoB9j46y93Lpm9wbt3OgwRpPhw4Ub5UXalgt_dR.W3rbMUSdua2Er1npHjJOObKoVy8L6ACJtDgPCL5tXwuzCs9yn3ihEUftKAcRT.ULj4gG0HfgzmVEve0qrLF197AWKnOR5DEon4ruaDtcdPa._jYBarJ64mM0ZbQyc5OlbSbWrZdxndgiv0PC87P6gDBvJCceMI9xpIOsDxX18YCTV5DmlxdbH.tD0FuuEmX_qd4KrxN.AMPxwEa.4LZj11vPhpLXzgF2zI8paaUBPJOM3fAAyivRhM.IagMIyKR71vmk2EEWLGH.0.wnHO25CPFh7pWyys5Ibx5wGGDleIGwjwLT6ZQwbRcgfuFnI5IoGibh3QI62ru6PygkJDPf2Sg8OPAZANPSobSmRp5HdK2UznQiOa2Mul2fRrTJZrrtNcTc6X3BGjVe5Xltn_BFxhMWmoQzlT9nUdoMM25q591jkp4rtZhgZooVtv_Hu1RS13yi8ebiMsRfHSZRmGmJ.IgjT91w- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-Id: <2121D4F4-AB03-49A0-9154-5E9D186E9391@yahoo.com> From: David Jencks To: dev@activemq.apache.org In-Reply-To: <36e91d9d1001040942t672140e4x6dfb39708ced9b76@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: activemq assembled with blueprint? Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 10:27:29 -0800 References: <36e91d9d0912290036m1f600bb0n205f4149371c590d@mail.gmail.com> <32E6277A-8A77-4CBD-AAB6-C53B41313FFB@yahoo.com> <36e91d9d1001040942t672140e4x6dfb39708ced9b76@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jan 4, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote: > Hi David, > > sorry my bad, I misread it and thought you mean on a full osgi-based > architecture. I'm interested in playing with blueprint config and > provide a > basic config demo file (and support) soon. But I guess until we > create a > custom XML support for it (such as XBean), we can't use it in > production. > Any thoughts from others on this? Well, yes :-) I've been working on an xbean-blueprint port of xbean-spring and a lot of it is working (but not committed yet). I'm hoping to finish it in the next day or two and then see about using it with amq. Maybe this can get included in 5.3.1. thanks david jencks > > Cheers > -- > Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb > > Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net > > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:45 PM, David Jencks > wrote: > >> AFAICT there might be some actual code changes if you wanted to >> make things >> like transports into osgi services that get hooked up or removed >> dynamically, but just changing the assembly to use blueprint ought >> to be >> pretty straightforward.... am I missing anything obvious that >> requires this >> to wait? >> >> Anyone have an idea of the amq 6 timeframe? >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> >> On Dec 29, 2009, at 12:36 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote: >> >> Hi David, >>> >>> that's considered for ActiveMQ 6. No work has been started yet >>> afaik. >>> >>> Cheers >>> -- >>> Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb >>> >>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ >>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 2:30 AM, David Jencks >> > >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Has anyone worked on assembling activemq broker with osgi blueprint >>>> rather >>>> than spring? On a related issue has anyone thought about the >>>> relationship >>>> between xbean-spring and osgi blueprint? >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> david jencks >>>> >>>> >>>> >>