Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chirino@gmail.com designates
 209.85.219.215 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=CnTp+1MjVU7t2c6AD7SCNtAVcCX0uefMeuj6C3LGGZx1Xrh0de1wpLIBtLfzAzqeqf
         S5xW39fsqDdwllTaPi63enTQQ0OEHDejSK9RTZyHfaXF7Mb2+aVfxwWenhGvte1ZE5fi
         ElDJ2P7JZOCZw53zKvem4AbirJLvawmvj1kbk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: chirino@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <7b3355cb0911210832m2b85b21dxe9cc7f657df6787d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7b3355cb0911201830y5a4a7704offd1622cf38308c6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <D0028F9F-D32F-428C-94AA-CC9DAAB4584D@gmail.com>
	 <7b3355cb0911210832m2b85b21dxe9cc7f657df6787d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:19:26 -0500
Message-ID: <af2843cd0911230419n7a1be637o62ee908f9b4abade@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Are JIRA issue flooding your inbox?
From: Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I think a good middle ground is that we time box how long we let an
issue without a unit test sit around before it's  kicked.  If the
original reporter or another contributor has not provided a unit test
in a month, we should close it out.

On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.snyder@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I attempt weeding every few months - trouble is - its a jungle ;)
>
> Agreed, which is why I'm trying to get everyone to look at a few. Then
> we can move on to the 5.4.0 issues using the same scrutiny.
>
>> A lot of
>> the unresolved issues will take a lot of time to validate - as they do have
>> steps to reproduce - but they aren't junit tests
>
> HIram and I talked about that briefly. We agreed that we need to be
> more strict about this. Hiram is in favor of kicking any issue that
> doesn't have a test. I wouldn't go that far, my threshold is a
> requirement of steps to reproduce. So if neither of those are
> available, and the issue seems sufficiently unclear, just kick it.
>
>> Can you make the filter public btw ? I can't see it
>
> Sorry about that, it's now shared.
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com/