activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.3.0 RC4
Date Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:44:05 GMT
In any case I don't think a change like that should hold up a release.

Is the release official yet?  I'd like to submit the board report and
holding off until I find out if this release is the final cut of 5.3

Regards,
Hiram

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> demo web app enables REST and Ajax APIs at the moment
> camel is the new web console for monitoring camel routes and endpoints.
>
> I don't see any problem in running these apps by default.
>
> Cheers
> --
> Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
>
> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.snyder@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Bruce,
>> >
>> > the conclusion was that many people use web console in the production to
>> > monitor the broker, so it's there by default. Also, it enables rest and
>> ajax
>> > apis.
>>
>> Yes, the /admin app is the web console and I think the /fileserver app
>> is the one enables REST. But the /camel and /demo apps are not
>> required, are they? Shouldn't those be moved to the activemq-demo.xml
>> config?
>>
>> Bruce
>> --
>> perl -e 'print
>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>> );'
>>
>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>
>



-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com/

Mime
View raw message