Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bruce.snyder@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.218.224 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=u1lPuELpf1MhOJe4ETT+n9cQXHjOBpHMV+D5IZNLOdRLhFWIDGPS5wdlNvLk4OEisE
         aDZIJhWIvpZfHkfq/kigm1ycsMrZK4vTUgWGNGvfXJBDjI+zq2oJrClCsRAu7Vn/2wU5
         LH4FPpHiZKkv5oCW3UdHXlq5jKtO+UOEhC+08=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1E238B09-884F-4180-AFEC-46E235EA92BC@gmail.com>
References: <af2843cd0909250943h56d3b9a5mc2b11fb3e383d516@mail.gmail.com>
	 <36e91d9d0909250948q33576a21pcc23b567ad06355c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <36e91d9d0909250949h6a82d4bfydb149d6392c1f02e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <af2843cd0909251004g55f7da44wb0b1cfc4357ef039@mail.gmail.com>
	 <af2843cd0909251007n7404c7b1u1546790d6fedc3ae@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1E238B09-884F-4180-AFEC-46E235EA92BC@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:43:40 -0600
Message-ID: <7b3355cb0909251043h8639f92ifcbeca93f2031d14@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Other dormant modules..
From: Bruce Snyder <bruce.snyder@gmail.com>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com> wrote:
> And message groups and active-blaze - for now
> On 25 Sep 2009, at 18:07, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
>> and even activemq-perftest. =A0Seems we have lots of long running / sock
>> tests that we don't really run during the build.
>> I don't see the point of leaving these in for now. =A0I think it may be
>> best to organize 1 separate module of these tests that we can
>> periodically execute these against any release of ActiveMQ?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Hiram Chirino <chirino@gmail.com> wrote=
:
>>>
>>> And how about activemq-camel-loadtest ??
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> and maybe activemq-repository-builder ?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> --
>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>
>>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Just wanted to bring that up ...
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> And would add
>>>>>
>>>>> activemq-camel-loadtest
>>>>> and probably activemq-groups (Rob what do you think of this?)
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>
>>>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Hiram Chirino
>>>>> <hiram@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I noticed that we have some other dormant modules.. I think these al=
so
>>>>>> should go into the sandbox. =A0What do you guys think? =A0We could a=
lways
>>>>>> bring them back in a subsequent release if some demand pops up. =A0O=
r
>>>>>> perhaps spin them off with an independent release cycle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> activemq-soaktest
>>>>>> activemq-systest
>>>>>> activemq-protocol-buffer
>>>>>> activemq-book
>>>>>> activemq-test-atomikos

+1 to moving all the modules listed in this thread to the sandbox.

Bruce
--=20
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=3D6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I=
;\"YC;VT*"
);'

ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder