On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Rob Davies wrote: > And message groups and active-blaze - for now > On 25 Sep 2009, at 18:07, Hiram Chirino wrote: > >> and even activemq-perftest.  Seems we have lots of long running / sock >> tests that we don't really run during the build. >> I don't see the point of leaving these in for now.  I think it may be >> best to organize 1 separate module of these tests that we can >> periodically execute these against any release of ActiveMQ? >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote: >>> >>> And how about activemq-camel-loadtest ?? >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Dejan Bosanac >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> and maybe activemq-repository-builder ? >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> -- >>>> Dejan Bosanac >>>> >>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ >>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dejan Bosanac >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Just wanted to bring that up ... >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> And would add >>>>> >>>>> activemq-camel-loadtest >>>>> and probably activemq-groups (Rob what do you think of this?) >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> -- >>>>> Dejan Bosanac >>>>> >>>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ >>>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >>>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Hiram Chirino >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I noticed that we have some other dormant modules.. I think these also >>>>>> should go into the sandbox.  What do you guys think?  We could always >>>>>> bring them back in a subsequent release if some demand pops up.  Or >>>>>> perhaps spin them off with an independent release cycle. >>>>>> >>>>>> activemq-soaktest >>>>>> activemq-systest >>>>>> activemq-protocol-buffer >>>>>> activemq-book >>>>>> activemq-test-atomikos +1 to moving all the modules listed in this thread to the sandbox. Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E