activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hiram Chirino <chir...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Other dormant modules..
Date Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:12:02 GMT
ok... I'll create issues for each module so that it's tracked in the
jira change log.

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.snyder@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com> wrote:
>> And message groups and active-blaze - for now
>> On 25 Sep 2009, at 18:07, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>
>>> and even activemq-perftest.  Seems we have lots of long running / sock
>>> tests that we don't really run during the build.
>>> I don't see the point of leaving these in for now.  I think it may be
>>> best to organize 1 separate module of these tests that we can
>>> periodically execute these against any release of ActiveMQ?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Hiram Chirino <chirino@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> And how about activemq-camel-loadtest ??
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> and maybe activemq-repository-builder ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>
>>>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Just wanted to bring that up ...
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And would add
>>>>>>
>>>>>> activemq-camel-loadtest
>>>>>> and probably activemq-groups (Rob what do you think of this?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Hiram Chirino
>>>>>> <hiram@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I noticed that we have some other dormant modules.. I think these
also
>>>>>>> should go into the sandbox.  What do you guys think?  We could
always
>>>>>>> bring them back in a subsequent release if some demand pops up.
 Or
>>>>>>> perhaps spin them off with an independent release cycle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> activemq-soaktest
>>>>>>> activemq-systest
>>>>>>> activemq-protocol-buffer
>>>>>>> activemq-book
>>>>>>> activemq-test-atomikos
>
> +1 to moving all the modules listed in this thread to the sandbox.
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>



-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com/

Mime
View raw message