activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Cedric Neve (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Created: (AMQ-2355) Sending a message from an MDB in Weblogic 10.3.1: "Unable to use a wrapped JMS session in the transaction because two-phase commit is not available"
Date Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:52:36 GMT
Sending a message from an MDB in Weblogic 10.3.1: "Unable to use a wrapped JMS session in the
transaction because two-phase commit is not available"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: AMQ-2355
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2355
             Project: ActiveMQ
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Connector
    Affects Versions: 5.3.0
         Environment: Weblogic 10.3.1 (aka Oracle 11g), Fuse ActiveMQ 5.3.0.2, Fuse ActiveMQ
5.3.0.2 RA, Ubuntu 9.04
            Reporter: Cedric Neve


I am doing ActiveMQ validation tests for our client and we have encountered a bug that prevents
us from using it with Weblogic. The issue concerns the XA support of ActiveMQ within that
application server. With JBoss, the same test succeeded so this is more an integration problem
of the RA with Weblogic than a real bug with the connector.

I will attach the test project but here is the scenario:
1) A message is sent to testQueue4 (that is hosted by an ActiveMQ broker).
2) An MDB, deployed within Weblogic and listening on the queue through the connector (and
the deployment descriptors of the ejb), receives the message and starts processing it within
a transaction ( <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>, <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>).
3) The processing implies the sending of a message on testQueue5 that is configured within
the weblogic-ra.xml and through a ConnectionFactory that is also configured in that file (and
accessed through the EJB local references).
4) The send fails with the following stacktrace:
javax.jms.JMSException: [JMSPool:169822]Unable to use a wrapped JMS session in the transaction
because two-phase commit is not available
	at weblogic.deployment.jms.JMSExceptions.getJMSException(JMSExceptions.java:22)
	at weblogic.deployment.jms.WrappedTransactionalSession.enlistInExistingTransaction(WrappedTransactionalSession.java:153)
	at weblogic.deployment.jms.WrappedTransactionalSession.enlistInTransaction(WrappedTransactionalSession.java:206)
	at weblogic.deployment.jms.WrappedMessageProducer.send(WrappedMessageProducer.java:136)
	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.SendingMDB.sendJMS(SendingMDB.java:77)
	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.SendingMDB.onMessage(SendingMDB.java:36)
	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.SendingMDB_7x60v6_MDOImpl.onMessage(SendingMDB_7x60v6_MDOImpl.java:49)
	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy$MessageEndpointAlive.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:123)
	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:64)
	at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.run(ActiveMQSession.java:766)
	at org.apache.activemq.ra.ServerSessionImpl.run(ServerSessionImpl.java:169)
	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.runIt(WorkImpl.java:108)
	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.run(WorkImpl.java:44)
	at weblogic.connector.work.WorkRequest.run(WorkRequest.java:95)
	at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:516)
	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)

I am in contact with Fuse support and Oracle support about this case but we are stuck at the
moment and no one seems to be able to fix this. So this is a cry out to the community to help
us solve this issue and getter a better Weblogic support of ActiveMQ.

I will reproduce this with 5.2 (ActiveMQ version, not Fuse) and will post a comment about
that as soon as it is done. I do not think it is Fuse specific at this time.

Here is what I figured out so far:
- When using EJB local references, the elements that are accessed (in this case the connection
factory and the queue) should be enlisted in the transaction (hence the elistInExistingTransaction
method call in the stacktrace).
- This also happens when we are using a Foreign JNDI server to make the outbound connections
to ActiveMQ instead of the weblogic-ra.xml.
- Based on what the Oracle support told us, in debug mode, they saw that the are retrieving
ActiveMQConnectionFactory instance and not an ActiveMQXAConnectionFactory instance. This would
confirm that the XA support is not present for the Connection Factory returned by the Connector.

So, to fix this, we would wish to know how we could instruct the connector to return an XA
connection factory instead of the basic connection factory. It seems that the problem is not
only present for sending but is also present for reception:
1) Send a message to testQueue2
2) The message is received on an MDB deployed within WL 10.3.1 with transaction support and
using local EJB references
3) We through a RuntimeException in the onMessage() to test the rollback and receive the following
exception (which is fine for us):
13:47:29,756 ERROR [ActiveMQSession] error dispatching message: 
javax.ejb.EJBException: Unexpected exception in be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.onMessage():
java.lang.RuntimeException: Rollback to DLQ test
	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.onMessage(ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.java:23)
	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.onMessage(ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.java:49)
	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy$MessageEndpointAlive.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:123)
	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:64)
	at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.run(ActiveMQSession.java:766)
	at org.apache.activemq.ra.ServerSessionImpl.run(ServerSessionImpl.java:169)
	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.runIt(WorkImpl.java:108)
	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.run(WorkImpl.java:44)
	at weblogic.connector.work.WorkRequest.run(WorkRequest.java:95)
	at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:516)
	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
; nested exception is: java.lang.RuntimeException: Rollback to DLQ test
java.lang.RuntimeException: Rollback to DLQ test
	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.onMessage(ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.java:23)
	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.onMessage(ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.java:49)
	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy$MessageEndpointAlive.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:123)
	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:64)
	at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.run(ActiveMQSession.java:766)
	at org.apache.activemq.ra.ServerSessionImpl.run(ServerSessionImpl.java:169)
	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.runIt(WorkImpl.java:108)
	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.run(WorkImpl.java:44)
	at weblogic.connector.work.WorkRequest.run(WorkRequest.java:95)
	at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:516)
	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
javax.ejb.EJBException: Unexpected exception in be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.onMessage():
java.lang.RuntimeException: Rollback to DLQ test
	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.onMessage(ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.java:23)
	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.onMessage(ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.java:49)
	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy$MessageEndpointAlive.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:123)
	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:64)
	at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.run(ActiveMQSession.java:766)
	at org.apache.activemq.ra.ServerSessionImpl.run(ServerSessionImpl.java:169)
	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.runIt(WorkImpl.java:108)
	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.run(WorkImpl.java:44)
	at weblogic.connector.work.WorkRequest.run(WorkRequest.java:95)
	at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:516)
	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
; nested exception is: java.lang.RuntimeException: Rollback to DLQ test
	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.onMessage(ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.java:93)
	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy$MessageEndpointAlive.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:123)
	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:64)
	at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.run(ActiveMQSession.java:766)
	at org.apache.activemq.ra.ServerSessionImpl.run(ServerSessionImpl.java:169)
	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.runIt(WorkImpl.java:108)
	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.run(WorkImpl.java:44)
	at weblogic.connector.work.WorkRequest.run(WorkRequest.java:95)
	at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:516)
	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
4) The message is not redelivered even though the default behaviour is documented as provoking
5 deliveries before sending the message to the DLQ. Here, the message seems to be acknowledged
just as if the message reception was not in a transaction.

We are not using the "useRAManagedTransaction" activation config property since we want the
transaction to be container managed.

I will attach the MDB project and the weblogic-ra.xml for this case to be reproductible.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message