activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "sebastien (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (AMQ-2355) Sending a message from an MDB in Weblogic 10.3.1: "Unable to use a wrapped JMS session in the transaction because two-phase commit is not available"
Date Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:37:35 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=53660#action_53660
] 

sebastien commented on AMQ-2355:
--------------------------------

Hi,
i am Sebastien and I am part of the frontilne team of Weblogic support. 

Thanks David for your explanations.

I am currently checking how Weblogic container can force the connector to retrieve an XAConnection.
Maybe some attributes specified in the descriptors are skipped if there is an issue on this
side.

May you tell me what we need to pass to the connector to get such XA object?

Also I am wondering why there is no org.apache.activemq.ra.ActiveXAMQConnectionFactory that
can expose directly an XAConnectionFactory?

Thanks
Sebastien

> Sending a message from an MDB in Weblogic 10.3.1: "Unable to use a wrapped JMS session
in the transaction because two-phase commit is not available"
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-2355
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2355
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Connector
>    Affects Versions: 5.3.0
>         Environment: Weblogic 10.3.1 (aka Oracle 11g), ActiveMQ 5.2.0 and Fuse ActiveMQ
5.3.0.2, ActiveMQ 5.2.0 and Fuse ActiveMQ 5.3.0.2 connector, Ubuntu 9.04
>            Reporter: Cedric Neve
>         Attachments: MDBTest.zip, MDBTest.zip, weblogic-ra.xml, weblogic-ra.xml
>
>
> I am doing ActiveMQ validation tests for our client and we have encountered a bug that
prevents us from using it with Weblogic. The issue concerns the XA support of ActiveMQ within
that application server. With JBoss, the same test succeeded so this is more an integration
problem of the RA with Weblogic than a real bug with the connector.
> I will attach the test project but here is the scenario:
> 1) A message is sent to testQueue4 (that is hosted by an ActiveMQ broker).
> 2) An MDB, deployed within Weblogic and listening on the queue through the connector
(and the deployment descriptors of the ejb), receives the message and starts processing it
within a transaction ( <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>, <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>).
> 3) The processing implies the sending of a message on testQueue5 that is configured within
the weblogic-ra.xml and through a ConnectionFactory that is also configured in that file (and
accessed through the EJB local references).
> 4) The send fails with the following stacktrace:
> javax.jms.JMSException: [JMSPool:169822]Unable to use a wrapped JMS session in the transaction
because two-phase commit is not available
> 	at weblogic.deployment.jms.JMSExceptions.getJMSException(JMSExceptions.java:22)
> 	at weblogic.deployment.jms.WrappedTransactionalSession.enlistInExistingTransaction(WrappedTransactionalSession.java:153)
> 	at weblogic.deployment.jms.WrappedTransactionalSession.enlistInTransaction(WrappedTransactionalSession.java:206)
> 	at weblogic.deployment.jms.WrappedMessageProducer.send(WrappedMessageProducer.java:136)
> 	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.SendingMDB.sendJMS(SendingMDB.java:77)
> 	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.SendingMDB.onMessage(SendingMDB.java:36)
> 	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.SendingMDB_7x60v6_MDOImpl.onMessage(SendingMDB_7x60v6_MDOImpl.java:49)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy$MessageEndpointAlive.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:123)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:64)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.run(ActiveMQSession.java:766)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ra.ServerSessionImpl.run(ServerSessionImpl.java:169)
> 	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.runIt(WorkImpl.java:108)
> 	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.run(WorkImpl.java:44)
> 	at weblogic.connector.work.WorkRequest.run(WorkRequest.java:95)
> 	at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:516)
> 	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
> 	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
> I am in contact with Fuse support and Oracle support about this case but we are stuck
at the moment and no one seems to be able to fix this. So this is a cry out to the community
to help us solve this issue and getter a better Weblogic support of ActiveMQ.
> I will reproduce this with 5.2 (ActiveMQ version, not Fuse) and will post a comment about
that as soon as it is done. I do not think it is Fuse specific at this time.
> Here is what I figured out so far:
> - When using EJB local references, the elements that are accessed (in this case the connection
factory and the queue) should be enlisted in the transaction (hence the elistInExistingTransaction
method call in the stacktrace).
> - This also happens when we are using a Foreign JNDI server to make the outbound connections
to ActiveMQ instead of the weblogic-ra.xml.
> - Based on what the Oracle support told us, in debug mode, they saw that the are retrieving
ActiveMQConnectionFactory instance and not an ActiveMQXAConnectionFactory instance. This would
confirm that the XA support is not present for the Connection Factory returned by the Connector.
> So, to fix this, we would wish to know how we could instruct the connector to return
an XA connection factory instead of the basic connection factory. It seems that the problem
is not only present for sending but is also present for reception:
> 1) Send a message to testQueue2
> 2) The message is received on an MDB deployed within WL 10.3.1 with transaction support
and using local EJB references
> 3) We through a RuntimeException in the onMessage() to test the rollback and receive
the following exception (which is fine for us):
> 13:47:29,756 ERROR [ActiveMQSession] error dispatching message: 
> javax.ejb.EJBException: Unexpected exception in be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.onMessage():
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Rollback to DLQ test
> 	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.onMessage(ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.java:23)
> 	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.onMessage(ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.java:49)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy$MessageEndpointAlive.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:123)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:64)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.run(ActiveMQSession.java:766)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ra.ServerSessionImpl.run(ServerSessionImpl.java:169)
> 	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.runIt(WorkImpl.java:108)
> 	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.run(WorkImpl.java:44)
> 	at weblogic.connector.work.WorkRequest.run(WorkRequest.java:95)
> 	at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:516)
> 	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
> 	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
> ; nested exception is: java.lang.RuntimeException: Rollback to DLQ test
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Rollback to DLQ test
> 	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.onMessage(ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.java:23)
> 	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.onMessage(ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.java:49)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy$MessageEndpointAlive.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:123)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:64)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.run(ActiveMQSession.java:766)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ra.ServerSessionImpl.run(ServerSessionImpl.java:169)
> 	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.runIt(WorkImpl.java:108)
> 	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.run(WorkImpl.java:44)
> 	at weblogic.connector.work.WorkRequest.run(WorkRequest.java:95)
> 	at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:516)
> 	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
> 	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
> javax.ejb.EJBException: Unexpected exception in be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.onMessage():
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Rollback to DLQ test
> 	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.onMessage(ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB.java:23)
> 	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.onMessage(ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.java:49)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy$MessageEndpointAlive.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:123)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:64)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.run(ActiveMQSession.java:766)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ra.ServerSessionImpl.run(ServerSessionImpl.java:169)
> 	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.runIt(WorkImpl.java:108)
> 	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.run(WorkImpl.java:44)
> 	at weblogic.connector.work.WorkRequest.run(WorkRequest.java:95)
> 	at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:516)
> 	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
> 	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
> ; nested exception is: java.lang.RuntimeException: Rollback to DLQ test
> 	at be.fgov.minfin.ccff.fwk.application.ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.onMessage(ReceptionRollbackToDLQMDB_dz4wsg_MDOImpl.java:93)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy$MessageEndpointAlive.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:123)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ra.MessageEndpointProxy.onMessage(MessageEndpointProxy.java:64)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.run(ActiveMQSession.java:766)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.ra.ServerSessionImpl.run(ServerSessionImpl.java:169)
> 	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.runIt(WorkImpl.java:108)
> 	at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.run(WorkImpl.java:44)
> 	at weblogic.connector.work.WorkRequest.run(WorkRequest.java:95)
> 	at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:516)
> 	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
> 	at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
> 4) The message is not redelivered even though the default behaviour is documented as
provoking 5 deliveries before sending the message to the DLQ. Here, the message seems to be
acknowledged just as if the message reception was not in a transaction.
> We are not using the "useRAManagedTransaction" activation config property since we want
the transaction to be container managed.
> I will attach the MDB project and the weblogic-ra.xml for this case to be reproductible.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message