Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com designates
 72.14.220.155 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=DHhcEOG9A2eJSPKf3KIuCg1y/j5fM9U4BFvxk72+Kjtj5bqokCB17mbeO96go+3tCI
         +0gdEVz4+t5paGYmxMaetl9ZqCYBPLqyyO8oRiwWJq6WwCrhM0tBzLOmcwGIV9VTRun5
         YtO7UFdX6uOq2Uj3agGYDzSNoVzbb9VozomUg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3a73c17c0907241138h7e1a286dq9f15fbc5a1c2c1e9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <24648059.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <3a73c17c0907241015q72930d0cx1716c5348e4e0536@mail.gmail.com>
	 <24649622.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <3a73c17c0907241138h7e1a286dq9f15fbc5a1c2c1e9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:42:05 +0100
Message-ID: <3a73c17c0907290142t110ca610m8d4ad10e1a763be3@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: AMQ-1191 for 5.3 broke master/slave locking for Oracle
From: Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2498c6ba98a046fd429c1

--000e0cd2498c6ba98a046fd429c1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

reworked the resolution of AMQ-1191 to split out the locker implementation
for ms sqlserver. The current snapshot should now work with Oracle without
modification.

2009/7/24 Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>

> yea, exactly like that, where bean id="mydblocker" is an instance of your
> OracleDatabaseLocker.
>
> 2009/7/24 bwtaylor <bryan_w_taylor@yahoo.com>
>
>>
>> We have been using Oracle without issue with activemq 5.1, so prevoius
>> versions worked with Oracle. We can try creating our own
>> OracleDatabaseLocker if needed.
>>
>> I found setDatabaseLocker() on JDBCPersistenceAdapter, so in the custom
>> spring dialect, can I say something like
>>
>>  <persistenceAdapter>
>>    <jdbcPersistenceAdapter dataSource="#mydatasource"
>> databaseLocker="#mydblocker" />
>>  </persistenceAdapter>
>>
>> and then define mydblocker via regular spring config?
>>
>>
>> Gary Tully wrote:
>> >
>> > thanks for the heads up. It looks like it is time to have more than one
>> > database locker implementation in the box.
>> > A database locker implementation can be injected into the persistence
>> > adapter via config if that helps in the short term. Can you validate
>> that
>> > Oracle works fine without the getMetaData call?
>> >
>> > I have reopened AMQ-1191, thanks.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-1191-for-5.3-broke-master-slave-locking-for-Oracle-tp24648059p24649622.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> http://blog.garytully.com
>
> Open Source Integration
> http://fusesource.com
>


-- 
http://blog.garytully.com

Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com

--000e0cd2498c6ba98a046fd429c1--