From dev-return-15922-apmail-activemq-dev-archive=activemq.apache.org@activemq.apache.org Thu Jul 02 17:12:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10431 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 17:12:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 17:12:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 80070 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 17:13:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 80012 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 17:13:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 79987 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 17:13:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:13:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chubrilo@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.228] (HELO mail-ew0-f228.google.com) (209.85.219.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:12:49 +0000 Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so2496210ewy.38 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:12:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=JUa1Mg2RYsqrIpZlTMXX3rSZ8ymq1ViYthJ/t2VRMM0=; b=vei0owP6Zqa2fzeXWyf6vvTdE9nTs9zkJrN/xLbE9E641/ZxIT/wZvEOXLSMvjkQV+ D++IEVTOtCnl7Ps6UlJpD43+3NqDwqKRqdfTcLphOjOZ1AqfDxEAmjgxmPCFAIQqNuC1 dTz7S5siZYJZFi13avQwYCXaa2wXJB3b0cZoo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=yCWatzSEycDf4W6RjhxqluVSOnr4mkmV9acxtBPa4zuM4ZSO/IhCm21U/oAHrDotHD zrVyNrL9iMjTebDzIj45yMgNdRf4g5JGRGfccValHZzffFYIRvGmgnHAtNR0NmXN9IZY rHprCdNDO2TnEXhRJ7CFgemtkSUb6HoSbgij0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: chubrilo@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.53.199 with SMTP id g49mr85833wec.49.1246554749166; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:12:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:12:29 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: e8207f43db020165 Message-ID: <36e91d9d0907021012v660271a2j260a222d35d9f1f6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: How are snapshots getting deployed from hudson? From: Dejan Bosanac To: dev@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dbdf9d046447046dbc25ca X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6dbdf9d046447046dbc25ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi David, saw your ping on irc, but have problems connecting to it at the moment. Anyhow, there's an option in Hudson config for the project called "Post-build actions" and there it is checked "Deploy artifacts to Maven repository" with the url of repo. Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:20 AM, David Jencks wrote: > The recommendation is that snapshots that get deployed to apache's nexus be > timestamped. I fixed the build so that mvn clean deploy will result in > unique (timestamped) snapshots but the ones on nexus are still non-unique. > A little detective work reveals that they are getting deployed by > ci-hudson. However the hudson builds on the apache hudson are only running > mvn clean install so I'm wondering how the snapshots are getting deployed. > > I found an email referring to > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/2009/04/17/Continuous+Integration+Server > Is this the latest documentation? > > thanks > david jencks > --0016e6dbdf9d046447046dbc25ca--