activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: AMQ-1191 for 5.3 broke master/slave locking for Oracle
Date Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:42:05 GMT
reworked the resolution of AMQ-1191 to split out the locker implementation
for ms sqlserver. The current snapshot should now work with Oracle without
modification.

2009/7/24 Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>

> yea, exactly like that, where bean id="mydblocker" is an instance of your
> OracleDatabaseLocker.
>
> 2009/7/24 bwtaylor <bryan_w_taylor@yahoo.com>
>
>>
>> We have been using Oracle without issue with activemq 5.1, so prevoius
>> versions worked with Oracle. We can try creating our own
>> OracleDatabaseLocker if needed.
>>
>> I found setDatabaseLocker() on JDBCPersistenceAdapter, so in the custom
>> spring dialect, can I say something like
>>
>>  <persistenceAdapter>
>>    <jdbcPersistenceAdapter dataSource="#mydatasource"
>> databaseLocker="#mydblocker" />
>>  </persistenceAdapter>
>>
>> and then define mydblocker via regular spring config?
>>
>>
>> Gary Tully wrote:
>> >
>> > thanks for the heads up. It looks like it is time to have more than one
>> > database locker implementation in the box.
>> > A database locker implementation can be injected into the persistence
>> > adapter via config if that helps in the short term. Can you validate
>> that
>> > Oracle works fine without the getMetaData call?
>> >
>> > I have reopened AMQ-1191, thanks.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-1191-for-5.3-broke-master-slave-locking-for-Oracle-tp24648059p24649622.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> http://blog.garytully.com
>
> Open Source Integration
> http://fusesource.com
>



-- 
http://blog.garytully.com

Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message