Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tabish121@gmail.com designates
 74.125.92.149 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id
         :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=LQoCYOaPAMpVczkoiRX8tiLNjUPysDkEBHAeubX7HpG+pbwsCGNU8AynwPab856wZq
         rV9VWswF4cmS3yz+mBsjFKeXidqXR3Yg7zgu+QRTLDRbst6KHzkT0EvmU9f+xwgEEy9f
         Jr8zc6Of0hS4GPvAT1a8+54dShvS5ajO9O0+A=
Subject: Re: maven build upgrade?
From: Timothy Bish <tabish121@gmail.com>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <E71E0484-1093-4AF1-891A-1F9A42BBCAFA@yahoo.com>
References: <E71E0484-1093-4AF1-891A-1F9A42BBCAFA@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:13:20 -0400
Message-Id: <1245320000.23155.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:09 -0700, David Jencks wrote:
> The build is getting a little out of date.  I'd like to update the  
> parent to apache pom 6 and make some related changes to use the most  
> up to date maven build recommendations.  This will make it a lot  
> easier to produce release candidates that follow the apparent details  
> of apache release policy.  It will also deploy snapshots and releases  
> to the apache nexus instance which is much much much easier to use  
> than the file based repo.
> 
> Also there's some stuff to produce source distros more or less  
> automatically.
> 
> If we agree on this I'll file a jira as a sub-issue of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896 
> , we also need a vote apparently.  We can update the pom and start  
> pushing snapshots immediately.
> 
> One other advantage of nexus is that we can use unique timestamped  
> snapshots rather than non-unique "SNAPSHOT" snapshots which can reduce  
> internal maven confusion a bit.
> 
> I'm primarily thinking of trunk here, I might be able to work on other  
> active branches a bit if I know what they are :-)
> 
> thanks
> david jencks

+1


-- 
Tim Bish
http://fusesource.com
http://timbish.blogspot.com/