activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ying (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (AMQ-2009) Problem with message dispatch after a while
Date Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:27:35 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=52211#action_52211
] 

ying commented on AMQ-2009:
---------------------------

I have a simple cause which can cause dispatch problem:

1. setup a network of broker1, broker2, bridged by multicast discovery
2. make a producer send 5 msg to queueA to broker2
3. make a consumer to consume from broker1 queueA ( make it slow, so it only consumer 1 msg)
but make sure all 5 msg from broker2 are forwared to broker1
4. stop the consumer to broke1, restart it to consume from broker2 queueA
5. the 4 msgs originally published to broker2 and forwarded to broker1 and has not yet been
consumed will stuck on broker1 and will not forwarded to broker2 for the consumer to consume.

You can only clear out the 4 left over stuck msg by making consumer consume from broker1 in
this case.

This is a very critical issue because you might restart your application many times and run
into this.

I will look into how the demandfowardbridge handles this case. if you know anything about
this, please help. this is very urgent. thanks

> Problem with message dispatch after a while
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-2009
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2009
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 5.1.0, 5.2.0
>            Reporter: Rajani Chennamaneni
>            Assignee: Rob Davies
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 5.3.0
>
>         Attachments: AMQ-2009Testcase2.zip, consumertest.zip, DispatchMultipleConsumersTest.java,
JConsole-screenshot.jpg, testcase.zip
>
>
> Messages are not getting dispatched after a while (although it accepts new incoming messages)
until restart of the broker. This problem is described in several posts.
> http://www.nabble.com/Pending-Messages-are-shown-in-ActiveMQ-td20241332.html
> http://www.nabble.com/Consumer-Listener-stop-receving-message-until-ActiveMQ-restart-td20355247.html
> http://www.nabble.com/Stuck-messages---Dispatch-issues-td20467949.html
> There was also an issue opened in Spring project for this thinking it was Spring problem.
> http://jira.springframework.org/browse/SPR-5110
> I am not able to reproduce with Junit test case having BrokerService started with in
the test case. I guess I am not hitting the right stress conditions this way. But when I run
the test case against an externally running ActiveMQ instance backed with oracle database
persistence, it is reproducible most of the times. This is not a every time failure situation,
it takes more time once than the other.
> I was able to hit this situation of stuck messages on queue using following scenario
most of the times:
> 1) Start 2 concurrent consumers for the queue using Spring's DefaultMessageListenerContainer
using cacheLevelName as CACHE_CONSUMER
> 2) Send messages using JMETER 2.3.2 to the queue on ActiveMQ stand alone broker instance
with 50 threads looping 20 times.
> 3) After a while, you will notice that Spring logs that no messages are being received
but the messages are shown jconsole of ActiveMQ and the database backing it for persistence.
> But in 5.2 RC3, the problem is that it dispatches duplicate messages and does not remove
them from broker's database after acknowledge properly.
> Attached test case might help to reproduce when run against externally running stand
alone ActiveMQ broker. Another way to see the problem is that try to load test using JMETER
by sending messages to a queue with a camel route that moves messages from this queue to another
and you will notice that it stops moving after while or copied duplicates in case of 5.2 RC3.
> Sorry about such a huge description but it is a real problem! A different team at our
company are having this issue in production with 5.1. They are using it as an embedded broker
with derby for persistence.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message