Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50372 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2009 07:53:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Apr 2009 07:53:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 45499 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2009 07:53:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 45438 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2009 07:53:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 45428 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2009 07:53:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:53:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of peter.j.donald@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.245 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.245] (HELO rv-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.198.245) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:53:03 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so1217494rvb.26 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:52:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QqIYTC3/X2DLkQ1MZmVWqwKybOegRjM5r7+zONXU7c8=; b=bASW99wnNTJcodqQznUoNeB3mQRThIxbeQq4WIWi4UbWCv8vk9dhLKZB079wrst1sb 49qtTV+GcXmg+QGN5cLMHALWTPohPy66L1S46GsJiAHeRlbhbOpEueaDnsMuOHriqoJw QSUqTjFEWD44NpmjESMt6cuL75Oujn43RSawk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=o0b1KWk5mK7XG8nzolxJhi16eE47Eq35Uwcami4xOi4dqmUlp2lTM7sN6jwkklZzFf 98VxkVHZpsihTqw+6qDoEAiifuOp2AbtUVq+zEr5oUuasZomB32L+ISt26cL4StFHwvA /TCIGO4ms1rwJRmfDA8JG9+TEX6el0A/9rhTQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: peter.j.donald@gmail.com Received: by 10.142.246.20 with SMTP id t20mr1158148wfh.348.1240732362582; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:52:42 +1000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 457c8e8ae1596e19 Message-ID: <125c0c0d0904260052l45a90797ge39cd2c2903ffd3f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Out of date content in svn From: Peter Donald To: dev@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I just started to have a look at activemq and theres a few things that seem out of date or maybe I am just not following things. activemq-book: Can activemq-book be removed? There has been no real content changing action on it since 2/11/07 or r505858. Now that "ActiveMQ in Action!" is in progress I see no real value in having it still about. activemq-camel(-loadtest): Why are these modules in activemq? Would it not be better for it to be moved to camel project? It seems suboptimal to have dependencies like AMQ -> Camel -> AMQ. It seems as if the Camel infrastructure is likely to evolve at a faster rate than the AMQ interfaces so leaving this code here is probably going to result in more code churn? activemq-protocol-buffer: Is this used? Is there plans to use it? If not can it be removed. By the naming I would assume it sits in a similar role to activemq-protobuf but thats just a guess. The following modules are not included in the parent pom file. Does this mean that they are not used? Can they be deleted then? * activemq-camel-loadtest * activemq-groups * activemq-perftest * activemq-protocol-buffer * activemq-repository-builder * activemq-soaktest * activemq-systest -- Cheers, Peter Donald Steven Wright - "A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths."