Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1051 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2009 05:19:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2009 05:19:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 51119 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 05:19:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 51092 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 05:19:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 50982 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2009 05:19:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:19:23 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:19:21 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6D2234C4AA for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:19:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <249785828.1235452740324.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:19:00 -0800 (PST) From: "H B (JIRA)" To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (AMQ-2136) Reply queue performance hit upgrading to 5.2 In-Reply-To: <209012163.1235253179425.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=49929#action_49929 ] H B commented on AMQ-2136: -------------------------- Transaction is needed if several messages are sent together. But why does the Kaha store (w/ 5.2) work much faster? In any case, 23 msg/s in transact mode seems too slow. A database can beat it easily. > Reply queue performance hit upgrading to 5.2 > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: AMQ-2136 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2136 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Performance Test > Affects Versions: 5.2.0 > Environment: Windows Vista, JDK 1.6 > Reporter: H B > Priority: Critical > Attachments: test.java > > > When upgrading to AMQ 5.2, my application gets 10x slower. This is traced to the usage of reply queue. I have written a test case (will be attached.) > In 5.1, > sender: 16.0 seconds spent for sending 8000 times, avg. 500.0msg/s > In 5.2: > sender: 432.0 seconds spent for sending 10000 times, avg. 23.148148msg/s > I have tried arrange the steps a bit (see commented out line,) no help. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.