Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33719 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2009 19:52:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2009 19:52:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 66213 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2009 19:52:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 66200 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2009 19:52:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 66189 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2009 19:52:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:52:04 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rajdavies@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.12 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.12] (HELO mail-qy0-f12.google.com) (209.85.221.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:51:56 +0000 Received: by qyk5 with SMTP id 5so3558367qyk.14 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:51:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=RJLr5mw1kypTrLpjcD2HFTOV9YfGmIBMNWoJXuec/eQ=; b=w8mktfB6eQUoGV3Hq35Fe43Fvya7Jlyb/fpzJjqMN0RuxaoyIz/loBnVtbvgCcdHGV oJZaY2+IPOkhhoGvf6MBO9QQlvuvpzh3qlLdF2p4Sc6362sxo6uzLtAsjHMX9AdB1mbA lIxp839nlsKQFk31jn1VH7SOHqZBdLtYzZnoc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=D9AMXvRNMblKfzX2ezLd8c2c7CMkiGMfcBXp9hUb5HShYYQYA/iIrgRU8V+aYejUsq Kf/DnHMRHYYrBRaFvNIV41dUhRrdxdO5nDUM964xiYVWiHB61Td3a3FXQjwGjqw/7d7w zLH2R5fFG5RcAJQb9/+8G5W3YzsckMlqnWF3U= Received: by 10.214.147.8 with SMTP id u8mr3198270qad.129.1232481095598; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:51:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.76? (host86-168-83-211.range86-168.btcentralplus.com [86.168.83.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm2421830qwh.56.2009.01.20.11.51.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:51:34 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: From: Rob Davies To: dev@activemq.apache.org In-Reply-To: <2F62F83E-9A1D-491B-AFC1-6E8499C98E07@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: When is 5.3 likely to be ready? Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:51:30 +0000 References: <2F62F83E-9A1D-491B-AFC1-6E8499C98E07@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org there's a wire format change - and as such there's some more bits and pieces to go in to take advantage of that - will be another few weeks at least! On 20 Jan 2009, at 18:13, David Jencks wrote: > Geronimo has finally upgraded to activeMQ 5.x and we're currently > using trunk. We'd like to release in the foreseeable future.... > > Can anyone speak to when AMQ 5.3 is likely to be ready and what the > major bits left are? > > many thanks > david jencks > >