Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <20593340.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:26:29 -0800 (PST)
From: semog <e.semog@gmail.com>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Patch for NMS ConnectionFactory problem with ASP.NET
In-Reply-To: <20563084.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <20563084.post@talk.nabble.com>


Hi Dan,

I applied the patch to the code base.  The change I put in is not exactly
what you submitted, but it is based on that.  I broke out the path lookup
into a separate function, and this helped clean up the code a bit.  Take a
look at the change and verify that it still works for you, and that you
agree with my modifications.  If not, let me know.

Thanks for contributing this.  It's a great addition.

- Jim


Daniel Ellis wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Good to see the NMS trunk is back up to speed and passing the unit tests. 
> This morning I had a problem getting the connection factory to work within
> ASP.NET and believe it may not be possible with the current
> implementation.
> 
> Currently the function 'LookupConnectionFactoryInfo' obtains the path to
> the nmsprovider.config file by looking in the directory of the currently
> executing assembly.  However ASP.NET does not run the assembly where the
> DLL is located.  Instead the DLL is copied to a path deep within the
> ASP.NET temporary files folder.
> 
> The attached patch now checks three folders:-
> 
> * Path.GetDirectoryName(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().Location);
> * AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory;
> * AppDomain.CurrentDomain.RelativeSearchPath;
> 
> I have tested this and it now works with both a service and an asp.net
> webapp.  I have done my best not to break the compact framework build, but
> have not managed to build that yet.  Is this a suitable implementation?
> 
>  http://www.nabble.com/file/p20563084/NMSConnectionFactory-aspnet.patch
> NMSConnectionFactory-aspnet.patch 
> 
> Regards,
> Dan
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Patch-for-NMS-ConnectionFactory-problem-with-ASP.NET-tp20563084p20593340.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.