Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Message-ID: <1480462766.1226652545554.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:49:05 -0800 (PST)
From: "Christian Gross (JIRA)" <jira+amqnet@apache.org>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (AMQNET-124) Irregular Behavior When Using Commit
 and Rollback on Non-Transacted Queue
In-Reply-To: <1505043759.1226619665433.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=47374#action_47374 ] 

Christian Gross commented on AMQNET-124:
----------------------------------------

I can do that. Please give me a few days 

> Irregular Behavior When Using Commit and Rollback on Non-Transacted Queue
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQNET-124
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-124
>             Project: ActiveMQ .Net
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ActiveMQ Client
>    Affects Versions: 1.2
>         Environment: Windows, Latest Code from Subversion database
>            Reporter: Christian Gross
>            Assignee: Jim Gomes
>
> If I instantiate a queue and then listen to it as non-transacted (eg not using AcknowledgementMode.Transactional), and then after processing a message call either session.Commit() or session.Rollback() I get REALLY random behavior.
> Sometimes messages don't appear. Sometimes messages appear, but they are the old messages even though within the queue it is a new message.
> I know that I should not be calling a transactional method on a non-transactional queue, but I thought an exception would be warranted.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.