Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52119 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2008 09:05:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2008 09:05:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 3130 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2008 09:05:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 3091 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2008 09:05:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 3075 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2008 09:05:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:05:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:04:02 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KnrRl-00077K-FQ for dev@activemq.apache.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:04:37 -0700 Message-ID: <19895054.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 02:04:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Hans Bausewein To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2 In-Reply-To: <19882877.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: hansb@comerwell.xs4all.nl References: <3a73c17c0810080152u159779a4j6f6806b7163b47e3@mail.gmail.com> <19882877.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hans Bausewein wrote: > > > A -1 from me again :( > > I think I have another: again a temporary queue is not deleted on the slave. It happened when an application exception occurred, so I think it is related to a rolled back transaction. When I solved the problem that caused the application exception I did not get more old temporary queues on the slave. Hans -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--ActiveMQ-5.2.0---RC2-tp19874910p19895054.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.