activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sharath Komarla (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (AMQ-1191) JDBC based Master/Slave not supported for TransactSQL based databases (SQL Server and Sybase)
Date Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:56:52 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=46869#action_46869
] 

Sharath Komarla commented on AMQ-1191:
--------------------------------------

Hello,

I've been waiting for this fix.  I have ended up grabbing the patch, and building the src
locally and deploying that instead of the standard distro.  The patch attached to this issue
works well with SQLServer 2005 without issues.

If this issue is up for voting, I would gladly put in my vote.  I was hoping this would get
fixed in 5.2.0, but it looks like the resolution to this has been pushed to 5.3.0.

Thanks for all the hard work put into the releases.

> JDBC based Master/Slave not supported for TransactSQL based databases (SQL Server and
Sybase)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-1191
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1191
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Broker
>            Reporter: James Strachan
>            Assignee: James Strachan
>             Fix For: 5.3.0
>
>         Attachments: patchfile
>
>
> The main issue is figuring out the exclusive lock SQL syntax. I think the following is
valid...
> SELECT * FROM TABLE WITH XLOCK

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message