Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.15 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=MY1BsVvG4RhCd5mYX7CbC/lckbfxpxBl2/ZcY6XCPtTSn0J4QHUTMwGiLj63QUXJWR
         Ge9ME5tmWHQ9wuh/g+hn+ZyAbxwoZA46/9EJ0zXJFMG7J4A4eumtAR5IDcxnG8O16sVk
         MhOryl2oXHhksA/k6JJAhML8ePayYQOo8d0Qs=
Message-ID: <3a73c17c0809040740v1976decelf15ee2abff487ca9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 15:40:45 +0100
From: "Gary Tully" <gary.tully@gmail.com>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: time for a 5.2 release I think.
In-Reply-To: <b23ecedc0809040733t30b870d5v8fda81bd54a00283@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3a73c17c0809040721j67180b4t8b2062c49a20c6fd@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ec6e67fd0809040727k2e8ebd72q1840128f6a393f38@mail.gmail.com>
	 <b23ecedc0809040733t30b870d5v8fda81bd54a00283@mail.gmail.com>

ok thanks, will do the jira release first.

so it is kind of an 'auto' roadmap, everything will be fixed in the
next release until it is not.
I guess this is the easiest way to keep things rolling.

A default of fix version unknown would require explicit roadmap
management and lots more work.

2008/9/4 Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com>:
> What I usually do is to release in JIRA before the actual release (you
> can always change the date later in jira) so that I can build the
> release notes and download page using the informations in jira.  As
> James said, when you release in jira, all the versions not fixed are
> put under the next version to be released.
> And I disagree that only resolved issues should have a fix version, as
> this is the way you can track a roadmap ...
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:27 PM, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2008/9/4 Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>:
>>> I want to do a 5.2 release.
>>
>> Yay!
>>
>>> There are 189 open issues with a fix
>>> version of 5.2 [1]. As these issues show up in the release notes[2], I
>>> think they should all be marked as fix version 'unknown' until they
>>> get resolved on trunk, in which event they again get a fix version. Am
>>> thinking that only resolved issues should have a fix version.
>>>
>>> comments?
>>
>> Yeah - when you actually do the release in JIRA, it moves all issues
>> with a fix for 5.2 to the next available release. So you might as well
>> just wait until we vote on the distro, then let JIRA do all the hard
>> work for you
>> --
>> James
>> -------
>> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>>
>> Open Source Integration
>> http://open.iona.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>