Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.15 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
        b=Do33+YuZtJT6ll0QusTVM6VQrdqKvFwct4K6zRUu/QJ3HAkR+EsAFGs7e7/8M1qj+8
         vKG37qGt6lY363vHb1H8wrTMo79PN0wp5BfjPLDvgdxYoyJ48Iq9vpvGqGclJTg+fFli
         zfKxedel7u1wjltStnkJagwwMOfF9vqOocugA=
Message-ID: <3a73c17c0809040721j67180b4t8b2062c49a20c6fd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 15:21:08 +0100
From: "Gary Tully" <gary.tully@gmail.com>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: time for a 5.2 release I think.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I want to do a 5.2 release. There are 189 open issues with a fix
version of 5.2 [1]. As these issues show up in the release notes[2], I
think they should all be marked as fix version 'unknown' until they
get resolved on trunk, in which event they again get a fix version. Am
thinking that only resolved issues should have a fix version.

comments?

[1] https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=10520&fixfor=11841&status=1&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC
[2] https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10520&styleName=Html&version=11841