activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gary Tully" <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: time for a 5.2 release I think.
Date Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:40:45 GMT
ok thanks, will do the jira release first.

so it is kind of an 'auto' roadmap, everything will be fixed in the
next release until it is not.
I guess this is the easiest way to keep things rolling.

A default of fix version unknown would require explicit roadmap
management and lots more work.

2008/9/4 Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com>:
> What I usually do is to release in JIRA before the actual release (you
> can always change the date later in jira) so that I can build the
> release notes and download page using the informations in jira.  As
> James said, when you release in jira, all the versions not fixed are
> put under the next version to be released.
> And I disagree that only resolved issues should have a fix version, as
> this is the way you can track a roadmap ...
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:27 PM, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2008/9/4 Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>:
>>> I want to do a 5.2 release.
>>
>> Yay!
>>
>>> There are 189 open issues with a fix
>>> version of 5.2 [1]. As these issues show up in the release notes[2], I
>>> think they should all be marked as fix version 'unknown' until they
>>> get resolved on trunk, in which event they again get a fix version. Am
>>> thinking that only resolved issues should have a fix version.
>>>
>>> comments?
>>
>> Yeah - when you actually do the release in JIRA, it moves all issues
>> with a fix for 5.2 to the next available release. So you might as well
>> just wait until we vote on the distro, then let JIRA do all the hard
>> work for you
>> --
>> James
>> -------
>> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>>
>> Open Source Integration
>> http://open.iona.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>

Mime
View raw message