activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gary Tully (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Updated: (AMQ-1100) BufferedTransportFilter or similar feature
Date Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:55:57 GMT


Gary Tully updated AMQ-1100:

    Fix Version/s: 5.3.0
                       (was: 5.2.0)

> BufferedTransportFilter or similar feature
> ------------------------------------------
>                 Key: AMQ-1100
>                 URL:
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Transport
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.0
>            Reporter: Hernan Otero
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 5.3.0
> I'm considering using ActiveMQ for an app that would transfer a large number of messages
over the http transport (across firewalls/internet).  I would want to  use async messages
(i.e. useAsyncSend=true) to boost performance.
> Would it make sense to introduce a BufferedTransportFilter to boost performance even
further? (considering the fact that these messages would be traveling over the internet).
 That is, the BufferedTransportFilter would wait a configurable amount of time before "batching
together" all the messages it received so far (or after some configurable limit in terms of
bytes and/or number of messages) and then pass this on to the next Transport.  Ideally, the
Transport API would have to be extended to allow for a onewayBatch(List<Object> messageBatch)
method (and the default implementation would just iterate over the list and rely on the existing
oneway(Object) method.  HttpClientTransport could then be extended to allow for a single POST
to send multiple messages over the internet.
> Is this something that was considered?  Or that exists in some other form that I missed
while going through the sources?
> I'd be willing to contribute some time for implementing this if the maintainers think
its a worthwhile feature to have.
> Thanks,
> Hernan

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message